Crowdsourcing-Based Disaster Management Using Fog Computing in Internet of Things Paradigm

In internet of things (IoT) paradigm, crowdsourcing is the process of obtaining and analyzing information or input to a particular task or project generated by a number of sources such as sensors, mobile devices, vehicles and human. Cloud computing is widely used for the services such as analyzing crowdsourced data and application implementation over the IoT. Nowadays, every country and human are prone to natural and artificial disasters. Early detection about disasters such as earthquakes, fire, storms, and floods can save thousands of people's life and effective preventive measure can be taken for the public safety. All the crowdsourced data which are providing the information of a certain geographic region are analyzed in a cloud platform. But, by the time the crowdsourced data makes its way to the cloud for analysis, the opportunity to act on it might be gone. Moreover, thousands of people's life will be lost. Therefore, fog computing is the new and efficient way to analyze such critical crowdsourced IoT data of disasters. In this paper, in order to detect and take necessary steps for public safety during a disaster, we propose a crowdsourcing-based disaster management using fog computing (CDMFC) model in IoT. Further, we also proposed a data offloading mechanism for our CDMFC model to send disaster-related IoT data to the fog even if a direct link to the fog is not available. Our proposed CDMFC model and its data offloading mechanism can detect real-time disasters and disseminate early information for public safety as compared to the conventional cloud computing based disaster management models.

[1]  BottaAlessio,et al.  Integration of Cloud computing and Internet of Things , 2016 .

[2]  O. Saeed,et al.  Towards Internet of Things: Survey and Future Vision , 2013 .

[3]  Lambros Lambrinos,et al.  On combining the Internet of Things with crowdsourcing in managing emergency situations , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[4]  Edin Mujkic,et al.  WEB 2.0: How social media applications leverage nonprofit responses during a wildfire crisis , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Guido Boella,et al.  SEeS@W: Internet of Persons meets Internet of Things for Safety at Work , 2016, CSCW '16 Companion.

[6]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  Fog Computing May Help to Save Energy in Cloud Computing , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Arkady B. Zaslavsky,et al.  Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by Internet of Things , 2013, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[8]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Integration of Cloud computing and Internet of Things: A survey , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[9]  David M. Eyers,et al.  Twenty Security Considerations for Cloud-Supported Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[10]  Soo Young Shin,et al.  Implementation of Escarpment Alarm System Using Terrestrial Reference System , 2015 .

[11]  Edward Curry,et al.  Thingsonomy: Tackling Variety in Internet of Things Events , 2015, IEEE Internet Computing.

[12]  Chintan Bhatt,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): In a Way of Smart World , 2016 .

[13]  Thorne Lay,et al.  Nepal at Risk: Interdisciplinary Lessons Learned from the April 2015 Nepal (Gorkha) Earthquake and Future Concerns, , 2016 .

[14]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Future Internet of Things: open issues and challenges , 2014, Wireless Networks.

[15]  Eui-Nam Huh,et al.  Fog Computing: The Cloud-IoT\/IoE Middleware Paradigm , 2016, IEEE Potentials.

[16]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Trustworthy Sensing for Public Safety in Cloud-Centric Internet of Things , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[17]  Thomas C. Schmidt,et al.  The Role of the Internet of Things in Network Resilience , 2014, IoT360.