Satellite Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Functions: Opportunities and Challenges for Reporting Obligations of the EU Habitat Directive

The Habitats Directive (HD) and the associated Natura 2000 Network represent the major commitment of the European Union to biodiversity conservation. They are aimed at maintaining natural habitats in a favourable conservation status, which is assessed every 6 years by the member states under the legal obligation derived from HD Articles 11 and 17. Such assessment relies on habitats compositional and structural attributes, but should also consider ecosystem functions. Monitoring such functions represents an opportunity to incorporate Remote Sensing (RS) into the real-world biodiversity monitoring efforts. Here, we introduce a set of prospects and issues connected with RS aided monitoring of ecosystem functions and services within the framework of the reporting obligations of HD.

[1]  A. Regos,et al.  Monitoring protected areas from space: A multi-temporal assessment using raptors as biodiversity surrogates , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  J. Cabello,et al.  Assessment of ecosystem functioning from space: Advancements in the Habitats Directive implementation , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[3]  Michael Förster,et al.  Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status - New opportunities and challenges , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[4]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise , 2013 .

[5]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Monitoring Natural Ecosystem and Ecological Gradients: Perspectives with EnMAP , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Ned Horning,et al.  Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Antonio Castro,et al.  Science-policy interface for addressing environmental problems in arid Spain , 2015 .

[8]  Anna F. Cord,et al.  Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives , 2016 .

[9]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Mapping beta diversity from space: Sparse Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling (SGDM) for analysing high‐dimensional data , 2015 .

[10]  Grégoire Dubois,et al.  Biophysical Characterization of Protected Areas Globally through Optimized Image Segmentation and Classification , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[11]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[12]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  Better together: Integrating and fusing multispectral and radar satellite imagery to inform biodiversity monitoring, ecological research and conservation science , 2017 .

[13]  Scott L. Powell,et al.  Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat‐based remote sensing , 2014 .

[15]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Use of Descriptors of Ecosystem Functioning for Monitoring a National Park Network: A Remote Sensing Approach , 2009, Environmental management.

[16]  Pierre-Yves Henry,et al.  Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  The ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation: insights from remote sensing , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[18]  Simon D. Jones,et al.  Are landscape ecologists addressing uncertainty in their remote sensing data? , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of ecosystem functions: opportunities, challenges and way forward , 2018 .

[20]  D. Alcaraz‐Segura,et al.  System for monitoring ecosystem functioning of Network of National Parks of Spain with remote sensing , 2016 .

[21]  H. Nagendra,et al.  Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: Assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats , 2013 .

[22]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[23]  Richard M. Lucas,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in harnessing satellite remote-sensing for biodiversity monitoring , 2015, Ecol. Informatics.

[24]  Tamara U. Wall,et al.  Use‐inspired science: making science usable by and useful to decision makers , 2017 .

[25]  A. Regos,et al.  The contribution of Earth observation technologies to the reporting obligations of the Habitats Directive and Natura 2000 network in a protected wetland , 2018, PeerJ.

[26]  B. Haest,et al.  Towards a Mature Age of Remote Sensing for Natura 2000 Habitat Conservation: Poor Method Transferability as a Prime Obstacle , 2017 .

[27]  D. Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning , 2014 .

[28]  Anthony Vodacek,et al.  Building capacity in remote sensing for conservation: present and future challenges , 2017 .