A Multicase Comparative Assessment of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Assimilation of Radar Observations. Part II: Short-Range Ensemble Forecasts

The quality of convective-scale ensemble forecasts, initialized from analysis ensembles obtained through the assimilation of radar observations using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), is investigated for cases whose behaviors span supercellular, linear, and multicellular organization. This work is the companion to Part I, which focused on the quality of analyses during the 60-min analysis period. Here, the focus is on 30-min ensemble forecasts initialized at the end of that period. As in Part I, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is employed as a simplified cloud model at 2-km horizontal grid spacing. Various observationspace and state-space verification metrics, computed both for ensemble means and individual ensemble members, are employed to assess the quality of ensemble forecasts comparatively across cases. While the cases exhibit noticeable differences in predictability, the forecast skill in each case, as measured by various metrics, decays on a time scale of tens of minutes. The ensemble spread also increases rapidly but significant outlier members or clustering among members are not encountered. Forecast quality is seen to be influenced to varying degrees by the respective initial soundings. While radar data assimilation is able to partially mitigate some of the negative effects in some situations, the supercell case, in particular, remains difficult to predict even after 60 min of data assimilation.

[1]  G. Evensen.  Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[2]  S. Cohn,et al.  Ooce Note Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation Construction of Correlation Functions in Two and Three Dimensions and Convolution Covariance Functions , 2022 .

[3]  Erik N. Rasmussen,et al.  Precipitation Uncertainty Due to Variations in Precipitation Particle Parameters within a Simple Microphysics Scheme , 2004 .

[4]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Initialization and Numerical Forecasting of a Supercell Storm Observed during STEPS , 2005 .

[5]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Ensemble Data Assimilation without Perturbed Observations , 2002 .

[6]  M. Xue,et al.  3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of Radial Velocity Analysis via 3DVAR , 2006 .

[7]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Explicit Cloud-Scale Models for Operational Forecasts: A Note of Caution , 2002 .

[8]  C. Snyder,et al.  A Multicase Comparative Assessment of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Assimilation of Radar Observations. Part I: Storm-Scale Analyses , 2009 .

[9]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Nowcasting Thunderstorms: A Status Report , 1998 .

[10]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Multiple-Radar Data Assimilation and Short-Range Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting of a Squall Line Observed during IHOP_2002 , 2007 .

[11]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique , 1998 .

[12]  Steven J. Weiss,et al.  Operational Ensemble Cloud Model Forecasts: Some Preliminary Results , 2003 .

[13]  J. Wyngaard,et al.  Resolution Requirements for the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection , 2003 .

[14]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  Scalable Implementations of Ensemble Filter Algorithms for Data Assimilation , 2007 .

[15]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Importance of Horizontally Inhomogeneous Environmental Initial Conditions to Ensemble Storm-Scale Radar Data Assimilation and Very Short-Range Forecasts , 2010 .

[16]  松山 洋.  「Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences(2nd edition), International Geophysics Series 91」, Daniel S. Wilks著, Academic Press, 2005年11月, 648頁, $94.95, ISBN978-0-12-751966-1(本だな) , 2010 .

[17]  Qin Xu,et al.  Using Radar Wind Observations to Improve Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction , 2006 .

[18]  Fanyou Kong,et al.  Multiresolution Ensemble Forecasts of an Observed Tornadic Thunderstorm System. Part II: Storm-Scale Experiments , 2007 .

[19]  Kenneth J. Westrick,et al.  Does Increasing Horizontal Resolution Produce More Skillful Forecasts , 2002 .

[20]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Ensemble Cloud Model Applications to Forecasting Thunderstorms , 2000 .

[21]  Ming Hu,et al.  3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of Radial Velocity Analysis via 3DVAR , 2006 .

[22]  Carl G. Mohr,et al.  The Simple Rectification to Cartesian Space of Folded Radial Velocities from Doppler Radar Sampling , 1986 .

[23]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[24]  Harold E. Brooks,et al.  Using Ensembles for Short-Range Forecasting , 1999 .

[25]  Alan Shapiro,et al.  Retrieval of model initial fields from single-Doppler observations of a supercell thunderstorm , 2002 .

[26]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Analysis and Prediction of a Squall Line Observed during IHOP Using Multiple WSR-88D Observations , 2008 .

[27]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  On the Use of Mesoscale and Cloud-Scale Models in Operational Forecasting , 1992 .

[28]  M. Xue,et al.  Numerical Forecasts of the 15–16 June 2002 Southern Plains Mesoscale Convective System: Impact of Mesoscale Data and Cloud Analysis , 2006 .

[29]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .

[30]  Neil I. Fox,et al.  The nowcasting of precipitation during Sydney 2000: An appraisal of the QPF algorithms , 2004 .

[31]  C. Bishop,et al.  Cloud-Resolving Hurricane Initialization and Prediction through Assimilation of Doppler Radar Observations with an Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2009 .

[32]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[33]  Jeffrey L. Anderson.  An Ensemble Adjustment Kalman Filter for Data Assimilation , 2001 .

[34]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project: Convective Storm Nowcasting , 2004 .

[35]  M. Xue,et al.  3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud Analysis and Its Impact , 2006 .