Accounting for the phase, spatial frequency and orientation demands of the task improves metrics based on the visual Strehl ratio

Advances in ophthalmic instrumentation have allowed high order aberrations to be measured in vivo. These measurements describe the distortions to a plane wavefront entering the eye, but not the effect they have on visual performance. One metric for predicting visual performance from a wavefront measurement uses the visual Strehl ratio, calculated in the optical transfer function (OTF) domain (VSOTF) (Thibos et al., 2004). We considered how well such a metric captures empirical measurements of the effects of defocus, coma and secondary astigmatism on letter identification and on reading. We show that predictions using the visual Strehl ratio can be significantly improved by weighting the OTF by the spatial frequency band that mediates letter identification and further improved by considering the orientation of phase and contrast changes imposed by the aberration. We additionally showed that these altered metrics compare well to a cross-correlation-based metric. We suggest a version of the visual Strehl ratio, VScombined, that incorporates primarily those phase disruptions and contrast changes that have been shown independently to affect object recognition processes. This metric compared well to VSOTF for letter identification and was the best predictor of reading performance, having a higher correlation with the data than either the VSOTF or cross-correlation-based metric.

[1]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of reading in central and peripheral vision. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading Speed Benefits from Increased Vertical Word Spacing in Normal Peripheral Vision , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[4]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Channel for reading , 2010 .

[5]  Raymond A. Applegate,et al.  Changes In Log Visual Strehl Predicts Changes In Visual Acuity , 2011 .

[6]  M. Netto,et al.  Wavefront-guided ablation: evidence for efficacy compared to traditional ablation. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Pelli,et al.  The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification , 2002, Vision Research.

[8]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Applying wavefront sensors and corneal topography to keratoconus. , 2002, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[10]  Edwin J Sarver,et al.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[11]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Arno Koning,et al.  Multiple object tracking: anticipatory attention doesn't "bounce". , 2012, Journal of vision.

[13]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[14]  Hélène Rouger,et al.  Just-Noticeable Levels of Aberration Correction , 2008 .

[15]  Tobias Buehren,et al.  Accommodation stimulus–response function and retinal image quality , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[17]  K. Alexander,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[20]  Chris Dainty,et al.  Use of a customized vision model to analyze the effects of higher-order ocular aberrations and neural filtering on contrast threshold performance. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Visual perception is affected by motor experience: Evidence from letter recognition , 2010 .

[22]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Correcting anterior corneal aberration and variability of lens movements in keratoconic eyes with back-surface customized soft contact lenses. , 2007, Optics letters.

[23]  A. Bradley,et al.  Phase changes induced by optical aberrations degrade letter and face acuity. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[24]  Hannah E Smithson,et al.  Different aberrations raise contrast thresholds for single-letter identification in line with their effect on cross-correlation-based confusability. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[25]  Michael N Jones,et al.  Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[27]  David C Burr,et al.  Long-term effects of monocular deprivation revealed with binocular rivalry gratings modulated in luminance and in color. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[28]  Xu Cheng,et al.  Estimating visual quality from wavefront aberration measurements. , 2003, Journal of refractive surgery.

[29]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Vision improvement by correcting higher-order aberrations with phase plates in normal eyes. , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[30]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Spatial-frequency properties of letter identification in amblyopia , 2002, Vision Research.

[31]  B. Howland,et al.  A subjective method for the measurement of monochromatic aberrations of the eye. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[32]  A. Bradley,et al.  Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[33]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[35]  A. Watson,et al.  Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[36]  A. Bradley,et al.  Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[37]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[38]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[39]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Oculomotor capture by transient events: a comparison of abrupt onsets, offsets, motion, and flicker. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[40]  Oscar Nestares,et al.  Bayesian model of Snellen visual acuity. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[41]  Huseyin Boyaci,et al.  Estimating the glossiness transfer function induced by changing illumination and testing its transitivity , 2004 .

[42]  R Navarro,et al.  Phase plates for wave-aberration compensation in the human eye. , 2000, Optics letters.

[43]  Chunlei Du,et al.  Correcting higher-order aberrations of the human eye with the use of a phase plate fabricated by a mask-moving technique , 2009 .

[44]  Eugénie Dalimier,et al.  Experimental validation of a Bayesian model of visual acuity. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[45]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[46]  Raymond A Applegate,et al.  Making sense out of wavefront sensing. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[47]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[48]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Katrina E. Parker,et al.  Performance of Wavefront-Guided Soft Lenses in Three Keratoconus Subjects , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Vision improvement by correcting higher-order aberrations with customized soft contact lenses in keratoconic eyes. , 2007, Optics letters.

[51]  K Knoblauch,et al.  Reading with fixed and variable character pitch. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[52]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[53]  Andrew B Watson,et al.  Modeling acuity for optotypes varying in complexity. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[54]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[55]  S. Morand,et al.  Looking away from faces: influence of high-level visual processes on saccade programming. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[56]  L. Thibos,et al.  Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[57]  H. Burian,et al.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[58]  James A. Ferwerda,et al.  Dalton's Jungle: a video game for assessing color anomalies in children's vision , 2004 .

[59]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  G. Sperling,et al.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[61]  R A Applegate,et al.  Refractive surgery, optical aberrations, and visual performance. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.

[62]  Hannah E Smithson,et al.  Not all aberrations are equal: reading impairment depends on aberration type and magnitude. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[63]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Customized correction of wavefront aberrations in abnormal human eyes by using a phase plate and a customized contact lens , 2006 .

[64]  Casper J Erkelens,et al.  The effect of changing size on vergence is mediated by changing disparity. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[65]  W N Charman,et al.  Wavefront aberration of the eye: a review. , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[66]  Norberto López-Gil,et al.  Aberration generation by contact lenses with aspheric and asymmetric surfaces. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.