Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf chlorophyll concentration and meteorological variables

Abstract We examined the dependence of stomatal conductance on physiological properties and meteorological variables using a Jarvis-type stomatal conductance model that included a function representing leaf chlorophyll concentration as a physiological property. We sampled the leaves of 5- and 10-year-old Quercus serrata trees. A low leaf chlorophyll concentration imposed a restriction on the opening capacity of the stomata. The stomatal conductance variability depended markedly on chlorophyll function; the degree of dependence was almost equal to that on solar radiation or vapour pressure deficit. The characteristics of stomatal conductance response to meteorological or physiological changes exhibited little seasonal variation (except relative to temperature). Stomatal conductance variability depended on the following meteorological parameters in decreasing order: radiation, vapour pressure deficit, leaf temperature, and soil moisture; this order did not vary seasonally. The dependence of stomatal conductance variability on the seasonal change in chlorophyll concentration was larger in spring and autumn than in summer. These results indicate that the consideration of seasonal changes in plant physiological properties is important in evaluating the water, energy, and CO2 cycles between plants and the atmosphere.

[1]  A. Pitman The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models , 2003 .

[2]  P. Jarvis The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[3]  E. Schulze,et al.  Relationships among Maximum Stomatal Conductance, Ecosystem Surface Conductance, Carbon Assimilation Rate, and Plant Nitrogen Nutrition: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise , 1994 .

[4]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[5]  X. Le Roux,et al.  Parameterization and testing of a biochemically based photosynthesis model for walnut (Juglans regia) trees and seedlings. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[6]  T. Lawson,et al.  Stomatal conductance does not correlate with photosynthetic capacity in transgenic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[7]  Katumi Musiake,et al.  Diurnal and Seasonal Variations of CO2 Exchange Processes over Typical Land Covers in Tropical Monsoon Region. , 2000 .

[8]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Spatial and seasonal variability of photosynthetic parameters and their relationship to leaf nitrogen in a deciduous forest. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[9]  Yoshiko Kosugi,et al.  Parameterization of the CO2 and H2O gas exchange of several temperate deciduous broad‐leaved trees at the leaf scale considering seasonal changes , 2003 .

[10]  L. Kappen,et al.  Responses of stomata to changes in humidity , 1971, Planta.

[11]  J. R. Evans Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants , 2004, Oecologia.

[12]  T. Mansfield,et al.  Physiology of Stomata , 1908, Nature.

[13]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthesis in Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.): VI. Response of Stomata to Temperature , 1975 .

[14]  Antonio Donato Nobre,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area , 2002 .

[15]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  On the economy of plant form and function. , 1988 .

[16]  J. Stewart Modelling surface conductance of pine forest , 1988 .

[17]  Diurnal and Seasonal Variations of Stomatal Conductance in a Secondary Temperate Forest , 2003 .

[18]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[19]  Sherwood B. Idso,et al.  An empirical model for stomatal resistance of field-grown wheat , 1985 .

[20]  P. Jarvis,et al.  CHANGES IN CHLOROPHYLL AND CAROTENOID CONTENT, SPECIFIC LEAF AREA AND DRY WEIGHT FRACTION IN SITKA SPRUCE, IN RESPONSE TO SHADING AND SEASON , 1977 .

[21]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[22]  M. J. Ogink-Hendriks Modelling surface conductance and transpiration of an oak forest in The Netherlands , 1995 .

[23]  Y. Kosugi,et al.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance on Leaves of Several Temperate Evergreen Broad-leaved Trees , 1994 .

[24]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  photosynthesis--nitrogen relationship in wild plants , 1986 .

[25]  John Tenhunen,et al.  A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade‐tolerant species Acer saccharum , 1997 .

[26]  S. Prince,et al.  Stomatal conductance of West-Central supersite vegetation in HAPEX-Sahel: measurements and empirical models , 1997 .

[27]  I. Strachan,et al.  Stomatal Conductance of Populus trichocarpa in Southern Iceland in Relation to Environmental Variables , 2002 .

[28]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.