Enhanced long-term and impaired short-term spatial memory in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice: evidence for a dual-process memory model.

The GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit is a key mediator of hippocampal synaptic plasticity and is especially important for a rapidly-induced, short-lasting form of potentiation. GluA1 gene deletion impairs hippocampus-dependent, spatial working memory, but spares hippocampus-dependent spatial reference memory. These findings may reflect the necessity of GluA1-dependent synaptic plasticity for short-term memory of recently visited places, but not for the ability to form long-term associations between a particular spatial location and an outcome. This hypothesis is in concordance with the theory that short-term and long-term memory depend on dissociable psychological processes. In this study we tested GluA1-/- mice on both short-term and long-term spatial memory using a simple novelty preference task. Mice were given a series of repeated exposures to a particular spatial location (the arm of a Y-maze) before their preference for a novel spatial location (the unvisited arm of the maze) over the familiar spatial location was assessed. GluA1-/- mice were impaired if the interval between the trials was short (1 min), but showed enhanced spatial memory if the interval between the trials was long (24 h). This enhancement was caused by the interval between the exposure trials rather than the interval prior to the test, thus demonstrating enhanced learning and not simply enhanced performance or expression of memory. This seemingly paradoxical enhancement of hippocampus-dependent spatial learning may be caused by GluA1 gene deletion reducing the detrimental effects of short-term memory on subsequent long-term learning. Thus, these results support a dual-process model of memory in which short-term and long-term memory are separate and sometimes competitive processes.

[1]  Graham L. Collingridge,et al.  A nomenclature for ligand-gated ion channels , 2009, Neuropharmacology.

[2]  J. Rawlins,et al.  A Within-Subjects, Within-Task Demonstration of Intact Spatial Reference Memory and Impaired Spatial Working Memory in Glutamate Receptor-A-Deficient Mice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  P. H. Seeburg,et al.  Spatial memory dissociations in mice lacking GluR1 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Groves,et al.  Habituation: a dual-process theory. , 1970, Psychological review.

[5]  G. Horn Habituation and Memory , 1971 .

[6]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : memory mechanisms , 1983 .

[7]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Molecular dissection of hippocampal theta-burst pairing potentiation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Davis,et al.  Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. , 1970, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  J. Aggleton,et al.  The Different Effects on Recognition Memory of Perirhinal Kainate and NMDA Glutamate Receptor Antagonism: Implications for Underlying Plasticity Mechanisms , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  David M. Bannerman,et al.  Effects of cytotoxic hippocampal lesions in mice on a cognitive test battery , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  Ole Paulsen,et al.  Induction and expression of GluA1 (GluR-A)-independent LTP in the hippocampus , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Associative modulation of the orienting response: distinct effects revealed by hippocampal lesions. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  J. Lübke,et al.  Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. , 1999, Science.

[14]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[15]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Hippocampal Lesions Disrupt an Associative Mismatch Process , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Hippocampal lesions modulate both associative and nonassociative priming. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  M. Bouton,et al.  Memory priming and trial spacing effects in Pavlovian learning , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[18]  J. Rawlins,et al.  The role of the GluR-A (GluR1) AMPA receptor subunit in learning and memory. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[19]  J. W. Whitlow CHAPTER 4 – Memory and Habituation , 1984 .

[20]  S. J. Martin,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[22]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  J. Rawlins,et al.  Deletion of glutamate receptor-A (GluR-A) AMPA receptor subunits impairs one-trial spatial memory. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  G. Lynch,et al.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5 , 1986, Nature.

[25]  R. Malenka,et al.  AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.