Self-Noise Models of Seismic Instruments

Based on coherence analysis methods we develop a method for computing low self-noise models of seismic sensors. We calculate self-noise models for 11 different production seismometers. This collection contains the majority of sensors currently in use at Global Seismographic Network Stations. By developing these noise models, with a standard estimation method, we are able to make absolute comparisons between different models of seismic sensors. This also provides a method of identifying quality variations between two or more of the same model sensor. Studying Earth's free oscillations requires a large amount of seismic data with a high signal-to-noise ratio at long periods (Laske 2004). Recent tomographic studies using ambient seismic noise (Shapiro et al. 2005) also require the self-noise of seismic instruments to be below that of the Earth's ambient background noise, because as they use Earth noise as the seismic signal. It is also important when making temporary sensor deployments that the instrument's noise levels are below that of the signals being used in the study (Wilson et al. 2002). In order to verify that seismic instruments meet the above demands and other user requirements it is important from a testing standpoint, that one be able to measure the self-noise of seismic sensors and develop baselines for different models of seismic instruments. The different methods used to estimate self-noise of seismic sensors have made it difficult to do side-by-side comparisons of their performance (Hutt et al. 2009). This lack of a self-noise estimate standard makes it difficult to assess when a sensor's self-noise is above the manufacturers' specifications, indicating a possible problem with the sensor or noisy site conditions. In sensor development it is important to be able to compare a prototype sensor's self-noise to that of known self-noise levels of a reference sensor. On top of these complications some …

[1]  Erhard Wielandt,et al.  Seismic Sensors and their Calibration , 2009 .

[2]  Daniel E. McNamara,et al.  Ambient Noise Levels in the Continental United States , 2004 .

[3]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[4]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Broadband Seismic Background Noise at Temporary Seismic Stations Observed on a Regional Scale in the Southwestern United States , 2002 .

[5]  Jonathan Berger,et al.  Ambient Earth noise: A survey of the Global Seismographic Network , 2004 .

[6]  Peter W. Rodgers,et al.  Self-noise spectra for 34 common electromagnetic seismometer/preamplifier pairs , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig,et al.  What Can Superconducting Gravimeters Contribute to Normal-Mode Seismology? , 2003 .

[8]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[9]  Reinoud Sleeman,et al.  Three-Channel Correlation Analysis: A New Technique to Measure Instrumental Noise of Digitizers and Seismic Sensors , 2006 .

[10]  L. Gary Holcomb A Numerical Study of Some Potential Sources of Error in Side-by-Side Seismometer Evaluations , 1990 .

[11]  R. P. Kromer,et al.  Method for calculating self-noise spectra and operating ranges for seismographic inertial sensors and recorders , 2010 .

[12]  Michel Campillo,et al.  High-Resolution Surface-Wave Tomography from Ambient Seismic Noise , 2005, Science.

[13]  L. Gary Holcomb,et al.  A Direct Method for Calculating Instrument Noise Levels in Side-by-Side Seismometer Evaluations , 1989 .