ESTUDIOS / RESEARCH STUDIES Is There a Rationale for Author Byline Order? A Case Study of the Journal of Informetrics

: Multiple authorship on research publications is common in many disciplines. Is the order in which authors ap- pear in the byline determined by consistent criteria? This study investigated co-authored papers published in the Journal of Informetrics in 2016, the year in which this representative journal of the area of informetrics started to publish the articles with the author contributions form, as a case study to determine if there is consistency in the author order based on author contributions. For the papers studied, there was greater consistency for the first and last authors, and less consistent rationale for the order of the remaining author positions for the papers studied. A survey sent to the authors of the publications studied revealed that authors believed the first and last author positions played a more distinctive role. The lack of agreement and function of author order in other positions raises the question about the significance of author order and its purpose in determining the credit authors receive for co-authored publications.

[1]  Caroline S. Wagner,et al.  The Collaborative Era in Science: Governing the Network , 2018 .

[2]  Charles W Fox,et al.  Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  The value and credits of n-authors publications , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[4]  Matthias Weber,et al.  The Effects of Listing Authors in Alphabetical Order: A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 2018 .

[5]  R. Perrucci,et al.  From Little Science to Big Science , 2017 .

[6]  C. Hilário,et al.  Scientific collaboration in Brazilian researches: a comparative study in the information science, mathematics and dentistry fields , 2017, Scientometrics.

[7]  John M. Logan,et al.  Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? , 2017, PloS one.

[8]  F. Zotor,et al.  Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship: A Review Article , 2017, Journal of public health in Africa.

[9]  M. Duffy,et al.  Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology , 2017, bioRxiv.

[10]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship , 2017, bioRxiv.

[11]  Nazmul Haque,et al.  The need to quantify authors' relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals , 2017, Scientometrics.

[13]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production , 2016, Social studies of science.

[15]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[16]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Reversing the byline hierarchy: The effect of equalizing bias on the accreditation of primary, secondary and senior authors , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[18]  X. Liu,et al.  Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[19]  Jan L. Youtie,et al.  Social dynamics of research collaboration: norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights , 2013, Scientometrics.

[20]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[21]  Prabir Kumar Das,et al.  Journal of Informetrics: A Bibliometric Profile , 2013 .

[22]  George A. Lozano,et al.  Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in An Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[23]  Marek Kosmulski,et al.  The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[24]  Bing He,et al.  Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[25]  L. Egghe,et al.  Five years "Journal of Informetrics" , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[27]  Mary Moore,et al.  Trends in Authorship Order in Biomedical Research Publications , 2011 .

[28]  Patrice Laget,et al.  Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position , 2011, Scientometrics.

[29]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective , 2011, Scientometrics.

[30]  Erica Frank,et al.  Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International Assessment , 2011, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[31]  Geraldina Porto Witter,et al.  Ética e autoria na produção textual científica. , 2010 .

[32]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[33]  Héctor Guerrero,et al.  A robust formula to credit authors for their publications , 2004, Scientometrics.

[34]  Howard D. White,et al.  Authors as citers over time , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Grit Laudel,et al.  Studying the embeddedness of researchers' careers: Can bibliometric methods help? , 2019, ISSI.

[36]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Investigating scientific collaboration through the sequence of authors in the publication bylines and the diversity of collaborators , 2019, ISSI.

[37]  Jian Du,et al.  Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices , 2013, Scientometrics.