Need probability affects retention: A direct demonstration

Recent memory theory has emphasized the concept ofneed probability—that is, the probability that a given piece of learned information will be tested at some point in the future. It has been proposed that, in real-world situations, need probability declines over time and that the memory-loss rate is calibrated to match the progressive reduction in need probability (J. R. Anderson & Schooler, 1991). The present experiments were designed to examine the influence of the slope of the need-probability curve on the slope of the retention curve. On each of several trials, subjects memorized a list of digits, then retained the digits in memory for 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 sec. Some trials ended with a recall test; other trials ended with the message, “no test.” In Experiment 1, the likelihood of encountering a memory test (i.e., the need probability) was made to either increase or decrease as the retention interval increased; in Experiment 2, need probability either was flat (invariant across retention intervals) or decreased as the retention interval increased. The results indicated that the shape of the need-probability curve influenced the slope of the retention curve (Experiment 1) and that the effect became larger as the experimental session progressed (Experiment 2). The findings support the notion that memory adapts to need probabilities and that the rate of forgetting is influenced by the slope of the need-probability curve. In addition, all of the forgetting curves approximated a power function, suggesting that need probability influences the slope but not the form of forgetting.

[1]  John Brown.  Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory , 1958 .

[2]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Facilitation in short- and long-term retention of paired associates following distributed practice in learning , 1964 .

[4]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  A reconsideration of the extinction-recovery theory , 1967 .

[5]  A. W. Melton.  The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory , 1970 .

[6]  S. S. Stevens.  Neural events and the psychophysical law. , 1970, Science.

[7]  A. Glenberg.  Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms , 1976 .

[8]  P. Muter,et al.  Very rapid forgetting , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[9]  David C. Rubin,et al.  On the retention function for autobiographical memory , 1982 .

[10]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[11]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[12]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[13]  M. Gardner,et al.  USING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1987, The Lancet.

[14]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[16]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[17]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Learning-forgetting independence, unidimensional memory models, and feature models: comment on Bogartz (1990). , 1990 .

[18]  D. Bamber,et al.  Learning-forgetting independence, unidimensional memory models, and feature models: comment on Bogartz (1990). , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[20]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[21]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Richard B. Anderson,et al.  Artifactual power curves in forgetting , 1997, Memory & cognition.