Importance of Manchester Triage in acute myocardial infarction: impact on prognosis

Background Fast and effective diagnosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Emergency Department (ED) is needed. Manchester Triage (MT) is based on identification of the patient's main complaint, establishing, through decision flowcharts, a target-time for first observation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of MT on short-term mortality in AMI and detect potential improvements, and to analyse high-risk groups: diabetic patients, women and older patients. Methods 332 consecutive patients (69.0+13.6 years mean age; 34.9% women) with final diagnosis of AMI were assessed in the ED using MT. Data were analysed according to demographics and risk groups, as well as several AMI parameters, admission duration and intrahospital mortality (IHM). Independent predictors of mortality were determined. Results 82.8% of patients met the ideal goal of ≤10 min target-time for a first observation (ITTFO). This was higher (95%) in typical presentations (‘chest pain’), versus 52% in other flowcharts; p<0.01. Patients ≥70 years old were less frequently screened with ITTFO ≤10 min (76.2% vs 90.0% in those under 70; p=0.001) or the ‘chest pain’ flowchart (66.9% vs 77.5%; p=0.031). IHM was 13.3%. Triage with ≤10 min ITTFO and the ‘chest pain’ algorithm seems to predict a lower mortality (0.33 OR; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.63; p=0.0005 and 0.49 OR; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.03; p=0.056). Conclusion MT proved to be an effective system. Patients with typical AMI presentation, ST elevation myocardial infarction and less than 70 years old are protected by MT, with lower ITTFO and better short-term survival.

[1]  E. Amsterdam,et al.  Chest pain emergency units. , 1999, Current opinion in cardiology.

[2]  K. Mackway-Jones,et al.  Detecting high-risk patients with chest pain. , 2003, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[3]  H. Falsetti,et al.  Surgery for acute myocardial infarction. , 1969, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  H. Thode,et al.  Clinical characteristics of diabetic vs nondiabetic patients who "rule-in" for acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  M. Cooke,et al.  Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill? , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[6]  S. Goodacre Should we establish chest pain observation units in the UK? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature , 2000, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[7]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[8]  Harry P. Selker,et al.  Presentations of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men and Women , 1997 .

[9]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: a report from TIMI IIIB. TIMI Investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  George A Wells,et al.  A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology , 2008, BMC emergency medicine.