Improving the Representation of Low Clouds and Drizzle in the ECMWF Model Based on ARM Observations from the Azores

AbstractIn this study, the representation of marine boundary layer clouds is investigated in the ECMWF model using observations from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) mobile facility deployment to Graciosa Island in the North Atlantic. Systematic errors in the occurrence of clouds, liquid water path, precipitation, and surface radiation are assessed in the operational model for a 19-month-long period. Boundary layer clouds were the most frequently observed cloud type but were underestimated by 10% in the model. Systematic but partially compensating surface radiation errors exist and can be linked to opposing cloud cover and liquid water path errors in broken (shallow cumulus) and overcast (stratocumulus) low-cloud regimes, consistent with previously reported results from the continental ARM Southern Great Plains (SGP) site. Occurrence of precipitation is overestimated by a factor of 1.5 at cloud base and by a factor of 2 at the surface, suggesting deficiencies in both the warm-rain formation and...

[1]  Roel Neggers,et al.  A Multiparcel Model for Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2002 .

[2]  A. P. Siebesma Shallow Cumulus Convection , 1998 .

[3]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[4]  Klaus Gierens,et al.  Ice supersaturation in the ECMWF integrated forecast system , 2007 .

[5]  Stephen A. Klein,et al.  A parametrization of the effects of cloud and precipitation overlap for use in general‐circulation models , 2000 .

[6]  Oleg A. Krasnov,et al.  Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations , 2007 .

[7]  I. Boutle,et al.  An improved representation of the raindrop size distribution for single‐moment microphysics schemes , 2012 .

[8]  Zhien Wang,et al.  Climatology of drizzle in marine boundary layer clouds based on 1 year of data from CloudSat and Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) , 2008 .

[9]  S. Solomon,et al.  How Often Does It Rain , 2006 .

[10]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[11]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Simulation of Present-Day and Twenty-First-Century Energy Budgets of the Southern Oceans , 2010 .

[12]  Nicolas Gaussiat,et al.  Accurate Liquid Water Path Retrieval from Low-Cost Microwave Radiometers Using Additional Information from a Lidar Ceilometer and Operational Forecast Models , 2007 .

[13]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  Using Continuous Ground-Based Radar and Lidar Measurements for Evaluating the Representation of Clouds in Four Operational Models , 2010 .

[14]  Hilding Sundqvist,et al.  A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content , 1978 .

[15]  E. Luke,et al.  Marine Boundary Layer Cloud Observations in the Azores , 2012 .

[16]  P. Bauer,et al.  Interpreting an evaluation of the ECMWF global model with CloudSat observations: ambiguities due to radar reflectivity forward operator uncertainties , 2012 .

[17]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of ECMWF Winter-Season Cloud Fraction with Radar-Derived Values , 2001 .

[18]  R. Hogan,et al.  Parameterizing the Difference in Cloud Fraction Defined by Area and by Volume as Observed with Radar and Lidar , 2005 .

[19]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget , 2009 .

[20]  I. Boutle,et al.  Spatial variability of liquid cloud and rain: observations and microphysical effects , 2014 .

[21]  B. Stevens,et al.  Revealing differences in GCM representations of low clouds , 2011 .

[22]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  GCM intercomparison of global cloud regimes: present-day evaluation and climate change response , 2007 .

[23]  Martin Köhler,et al.  Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales , 2008 .

[24]  M. Köhler,et al.  Unified treatment of dry convective and stratocumulus‐topped boundary layers in the ECMWF model , 2011 .

[25]  M. Tiedtke,et al.  Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models , 1993 .

[26]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A New Subcloud Model for Mass-Flux Convection Schemes: Influence on Triggering, Updraft Properties, and Model Climate , 2003 .

[27]  M. Webb,et al.  A quantitative performance assessment of cloud regimes in climate models , 2009 .

[28]  D. Randall,et al.  Evaluating Cloud Frequency of Occurrence and Cloud-Top Height Using Spaceborne Lidar Observations , 2009 .

[29]  D. Randall,et al.  Stochastic generation of subgrid‐scale cloudy columns for large‐scale models , 2004 .

[30]  S. Cheinet A Multiple Mass Flux Parameterization for the Surface-Generated Convection. Part II: Cloudy Cores , 2004 .

[31]  Richard G. Forbes,et al.  The Impact of Low Clouds on Surface Shortwave Radiation in the ECMWF Model , 2012 .

[32]  M. Khairoutdinov,et al.  A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus , 2000 .

[33]  Christian Jakob,et al.  Cloud Cover in the ECMWF Reanalysis , 1999 .

[34]  M. Lebsock,et al.  Microphysical implications of cloud‐precipitation covariance derived from satellite remote sensing , 2013 .

[35]  J. Morcrette,et al.  Impact of a New Radiation Package, McRad, in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System , 2008 .

[36]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar , 2000 .

[37]  Peter Bauer,et al.  Model Clouds over Oceans as Seen from Space: Comparison with HIRS/2 and MSU Radiances , 2001 .

[38]  E. Kessler On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations , 1969 .

[39]  Evaluation of Trade Cumulus in the ECMWF Model with Observations from CALIPSO , 2010 .