25 year trends in first time hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction, subsequent short and long term mortality, and the prognostic impact of sex and comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study

Objectives To examine 25 year trends in first time hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction in Denmark, subsequent short and long term mortality, and the prognostic impact of sex and comorbidity. Design Nationwide population based cohort study using medical registries. Setting All hospitals in Denmark. Subjects 234 331 patients with a first time hospitalisation for myocardial infarction from 1984 through 2008. Main outcome measures Standardised incidence rate of myocardial infarction and 30 day and 31–365 day mortality by sex. Comorbidity categories were defined as normal, moderate, severe, and very severe according to the Charlson comorbidity index, and were compared by means of mortality rate ratios based on Cox regression. Results The standardised incidence rate per 100 000 people decreased in the 25 year period by 37% for women (from 209 to 131) and by 48% for men (from 410 to 213). The 30 day, 31–365 day, and one year mortality declined from 31.4%, 15.6%, and 42.1% in 1984–8 to 14.8%, 11.1%, and 24.2% in 2004–8, respectively. After adjustment for age at time of myocardial infarction, men and women had the same one year risk of dying. The mortality reduction was independent of comorbidity category. Comparing patients with very severe versus normal comorbidity during 2004–8, the mortality rate ratio, adjusted for age and sex, was 1.96 (95% CI 1.83 to 2.11) within 30 days and 3.89 (3.58 to 4.24) within 31–365 days. Conclusions The rate of first time hospitalisation for myocardial infarction and subsequent short term mortality both declined by nearly half between 1984 and 2008. The reduction in mortality occurred for all patients, independent of sex and comorbidity. However, comorbidity burden was a strong prognostic factor for short and long term mortality, while sex was not.

[1]  Bing Li,et al.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  G. Beller Are you ever too old to be risk stratified? , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Juan Sanchis,et al.  Papel del índice de Charlson en el pronóstico a 30 días y 1 año tras un infarto agudo de miocardio , 2004 .

[4]  R. O'Connell,et al.  Utility of the Charlson Comorbidity Index Computed from Routinely Collected Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Codes , 2000, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  Michael Bruce Swift,et al.  A simulation study comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for directly standardized rates , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[6]  P. Mortensen,et al.  The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. , 2006, Danish medical bulletin.

[7]  K. Eagle,et al.  Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. , 2007, JAMA.

[8]  W. Kostis,et al.  Trends in Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction After Discharge From the Hospital , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  M. Graffar [Modern epidemiology]. , 1971, Bruxelles medical.

[10]  B. Gersh,et al.  Population Trends in the Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2011 .

[11]  D. McManus,et al.  Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. , 2011, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  M. Hobbs,et al.  Long term survival after evidence based treatment of acute myocardial infarction and revascularisation: follow-up of population based Perth MONICA cohort, 1984-2005 , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.

[15]  B. Gersh Declining Severity of Myocardial Infarction From 1987 to 2002: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study , 2010 .

[16]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Sex and time trends in cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality: the Framingham Heart Study, 1950-1989. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[18]  Mandeep Singh,et al.  Scores for Post–Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification in the Community , 2002, Circulation.

[19]  D. Jacobs,et al.  PREDICT: A simple risk score for clinical severity and long-term prognosis after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina: the Minnesota heart survey. , 1999, Circulation.

[20]  T. Henry,et al.  Impact of age on treatment and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, American heart journal.

[21]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Trends in Acute Myocardial Infarction in 4 Us States Clinical Characteristics, Quality of Care, and Outcomes , 2022 .

[22]  M. Osler,et al.  The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  D. Levy,et al.  Temporal Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality and Sudden Cardiac Death From 1950 to 1999: The Framingham Heart Study , 2004, Circulation.

[24]  B. Yawn,et al.  Trends in Incidence, Severity, and Outcome of Hospitalized Myocardial Infarction , 2010, Circulation.

[25]  J. Killian,et al.  Temporal trends in the incidence of coronary disease. , 2004, American Journal of Medicine.

[26]  Armando J Mendez,et al.  Evaluation of comorbidity scores to predict all-cause mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[27]  Francisco J Chorro,et al.  [Prognostic value of Charlson comorbidity index at 30 days and 1 year after acute myocardial infarction]. , 2004, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[28]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Contribution of trends in survival and coronar y-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations , 1999, The Lancet.

[29]  D. Balzi,et al.  Effect of comorbidity on coronary reperfusion strategy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, American heart journal.

[30]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  Julia A. Critchley,et al.  Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000 , 2004 .

[32]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. , 1999, Lancet.

[33]  F Van de Werf,et al.  Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Comorbidity and survival of Danish breast cancer patients from 1995 to 2005 , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[35]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Comparison of mortality rates in women versus men presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[36]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Constituent country inequalities in myocardial infarction incidence and case fatality in men and women in the United Kingdom, 1996-2005. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[37]  M. Hashemzadeh,et al.  Trends in the age adjusted mortality from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States (1988-2004) based on race, gender, infarct location and comorbidities. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[38]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[39]  J. Pell,et al.  Trends in case-fatality in 117 718 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction in Scotland. , 2000, European heart journal.

[40]  Richard Kahn,et al.  Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association , 2004, Stroke.

[41]  K. Thygesen,et al.  Erratum: Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2000) 36 (959-969)) , 2001 .

[42]  T. Nielsen,et al.  Does diabetes mellitus abolish the beneficial effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term risk of reinfarction after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with fibrinolysis? (A DANAMI-2 substudy). , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  D R Jacobs,et al.  Trends in Acute Coronary Heart Disease Mortality, Morbidity, and Medical Care From 1985 Through 1997: The Minnesota Heart Survey , 2001, Circulation.

[44]  S. Reis,et al.  Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  J. Ramires,et al.  The role of gender in the long-term prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction submitted to fibrinolytic treatment. , 2004, Annals of epidemiology.

[46]  C. Pedersen,et al.  The Danish Civil Registration System , 2011, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[47]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Nine-year trends in achievement of risk factor goals in the US and European outpatients with cardiovascular disease. , 2008, American heart journal.

[48]  J. Pell,et al.  Gender and survival: a population-based study of 201,114 men and women following a first acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  Ted Gansler,et al.  Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association * † , 2004, Circulation.

[50]  C. Gross,et al.  Is there evidence of implicit exclusion criteria for elderly subjects in randomized trials? Evidence from the GUSTO-1 study. , 2003, American heart journal.

[51]  J. Alpert,et al.  A 30-Year Perspective (1975–2005) Into the Changing Landscape of Patients Hospitalized With Initial Acute Myocardial Infarction: Worcester Heart Attack Study , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[52]  A. Tsiatis,et al.  The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[53]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition , 1986 .