Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the in vitro load bearing capacity of four-unit posterior frameworks made of glass ceramic with lithium-disilicate crystals (E2), of zirconia-reinforced glass-infiltrated alumina (ICZ) and of zirconia stabilized with 3 mol% yttria (CEZ). METHODS All frameworks mimicked a four-unit posterior situation with 7.3 mm2 interdental cross-sections and possessed exactly the same dimensions. The load bearing capacity was measured on a special bridge test setup with 15 specimens for each of the materials. The data were analyzed with Weibull statistics giving the characteristic load bearing capacity F0 at 63% failure probability and the Weibull modulus m as indicator for the reliability and reproducibility. RESULTS For the E2 frameworks the average load bearing capacity and the SD was 260 (+/-53) N, the characteristic load F0 282 N and the reliability m = 5.7. For the ICZ frameworks the average load bearing capacity was 470 (+/-101) N, F0 518 N and m = 4.5. CEZ frameworks revealed the highest average load bearing capacity of 706 (+/-123) N, the highest characteristic load bearing capacity F0 = 755 N and the best reliability m = 7.0. SIGNIFICANCE CEZ frameworks showed the best mechanical properties as demonstrated by the high values of average load bearing capacity, reliability and characteristic load bearing capacity with respect to the other ceramics studied. However, for four-unit posterior CEZ frameworks the connector size of 7.3 mm2 is insufficient to withstand occlusal forces reported in the literature. Four-unit posterior frameworks require a connector size larger than 7.3 mm2.

[1]  J. Geis-Gerstorfer,et al.  UNTERSUCHUNGEN ZUM ERMUDUNGSVERHALTEN DER DENTALKERAMIKEN ZIRKONDIOXID-TZPUND IN-CERAM , 1999 .

[2]  J A Tesk,et al.  Failure of All-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures in vitro and in vivo: Analysis and Modeling , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[3]  J. Bader,et al.  Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  K. Anusavice,et al.  Fracture Surface Characterization of Clinically Failed All-ceramic Crowns , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[5]  S. Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all-ceramic fixed partial denture. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioceramics: Materials and Applications II , 1996 .

[7]  R. Giordano,et al.  Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinically failed restorations. , 1990, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[8]  Heike Rudolph,et al.  CAD/CAM - Neue Technologien und Ent- wicklungen in Zahnmedizin und Zahntechnik , 2003 .

[9]  E. McLaren,et al.  All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. , 1998, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[10]  W. Wisser,et al.  Release and detection of dental corrosion products in vivo: development of an experimental model in rabbits. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  S. Campbell,et al.  Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  J E Lemons,et al.  Biodegradation of Restorative Metallic Systems , 1992, Advances in dental research.

[13]  A J Raigrodski,et al.  The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  D Lundgren,et al.  Occlusal forces in prosthetically restored dentitions: a methodological study. , 1984, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  M. Molin,et al.  Longevity and quality of FPDs: a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[16]  L. Gauckler,et al.  All-ceramic dental bridges by the direct ceramic machining process (DCM) , 1997 .

[17]  A Odén,et al.  Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  J. Tinschert,et al.  Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[19]  J A Sorensen,et al.  A clinical investigation on three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated with a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. , 1999, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[20]  P Schärer,et al.  Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. , 1992, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[21]  H. Claus,et al.  Vita In-Ceram, a new system for producing aluminium oxide crown and bridge substructures , 1990 .

[22]  M Andersson,et al.  Procera: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[23]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. , 1994, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[24]  R. Marx,et al.  BELASTBARKEIT VON ZIRKONOXIDVERSTARKTER IN-CERAM ALUMINA-KERAMIK , 1999 .

[25]  R. Marx,et al.  SEITENZAHNBRUCKEN AUS HOCHFESTER STRUKTURKERAMIK , 1999 .

[26]  B Andersson,et al.  Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to 10.5 years: a prospective clinical study. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[27]  J. Robert Kelly,et al.  CERAMICS IN RESTORATIVE AND PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY 1 , 1997 .

[28]  A Odén,et al.  A new all-ceramic crown. A dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping with porcelain. , 1993, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[29]  G. Kostorz High-tech ceramics : viewpoints and perspectives , 1989 .

[30]  W. Rieger 11 – Medical Applications of Ceramics , 1989 .