Determining the Significance of Protein Network Features and Attributes Using Permutation Testing.

Network analysis methods are increasing in popularity. An approach commonly applied to analyze proteomics data involves the use of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks to explore the systems-level cooperation between proteins identified in a study. In this context, protein interaction networks can be used alongside the statistical analysis of proteomics data and traditional functional enrichment or pathway enrichment analyses. In network analysis it is possible to adjust for some of the complexities that arise due to the known, explicit interdependence between the measured quantities, in particular, differences in the number of interactions between proteins. Here we describe a method for calculating robust empirical p-values for protein interaction networks. We also provide a worked example with python code demonstrating the implementation of this methodology.

[1]  K. Arga,et al.  The role of protein interaction networks in systems biomedicine , 2014, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[2]  G. Smyth,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Permutation P -values Should Never Be Zero: Calculating Exact P -values When Permutations Are Randomly Drawn , 2011 .

[3]  Henning Hermjakob,et al.  The HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative – Overcoming the Fragmentation of Proteomics Data , 2006, Proteomics.

[4]  Melissa J. Davis,et al.  Ripples in the pond--using a systems approach to decipher the cellular functions of membrane microdomains. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[5]  M. D. Ernst Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference , 2004 .

[6]  David R. Croucher,et al.  Tyrosine phosphorylation profiling reveals the signaling network characteristics of Basal breast cancer cells. , 2010, Cancer research.

[7]  Atul J. Butte,et al.  Ten Years of Pathway Analysis: Current Approaches and Outstanding Challenges , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Aaron S. Gajadhar,et al.  System level dynamics of post-translational modifications. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  Melissa J. Davis,et al.  Sleeping Beauty mutagenesis in a mouse medulloblastoma model defines networks that discriminate between human molecular subgroups , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Marcel J. T. Reinders,et al.  Fewer permutations, more accurate P-values , 2009, Bioinform..

[11]  Melissa J. Davis,et al.  Stimulus-dependent differences in signalling regulate epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and change the effects of drugs in breast cancer cell lines , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[12]  Zhongming Zhao,et al.  A comparative study of cancer proteins in the human protein-protein interaction network , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[13]  Jianmin Wu,et al.  PINA v2.0: mining interactome modules , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  P. Good,et al.  Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses , 1995 .

[15]  A. Aderem Systems Biology: Its Practice and Challenges , 2005, Cell.