Cytotoxicity, antibacterial and physicochemical properties of a new epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer containing calcium hydroxide

Background This study evaluated the cytotoxicity, antibacterial and physicochemical properties of a new epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer containing calcium-hydroxide Sealer Plus. AH Plus was used as a reference for comparison. Material and Methods Cytotoxicity evaluation was performed according to ISO-10993-5 specifications using MTT assay to check the 3T3 cells viability at 1- to 4-week periods. Antibacterial activity was evaluated using a direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. Radiopacity, solubility and flow evaluations were performed according to ISO-6876/2012 specifications. Setting time was assessed following the ANSI/ADA-standard-n.57. The pH level was measured at 3,24,48,72, and 168 hours. Data were statistically analyzed using t-test. The significance level adopted was P<0.05. Results AH Plus and Sealer Plus showed cytotoxic effects after 24 hours and 1 week of manipulation and become noncytotoxic after 2 weeks. No differences were observed in the cytotoxicity of both tested sealers (P>0.05). Direct contact results revealed that both freshly prepared sealers has antibacterial effects against Enterococcus faecalis. However, after 7 days both sealers had lost much of their antibacterial effects. Although AH Plus presented higher radiopacity and flow than Sealer Plus (P<0.05), both sealers showed minimum required values. No differences were observed in the solubility of both sealers (P>0.05). AH Plus showed a higher setting time when compared to Sealer Plus (P<0.05). AH Plus and Sealer Plus showed a neutral pH during all tested periods (P<0.05). Conclusions It can be concluded that Sealer Plus showed suitable properties to be used as an endodontic sealer, comparable with those obtained by AH Plus. Key words:Cytotoxicity, root canal filling materials, root canal obturation.

[1]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms , 2018, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  S. H. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity and Biocompatibility of New Resin Epoxy‐based Endodontic Sealer Containing Calcium Hydroxide , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  G. De-Deus,et al.  Dissolution, dislocation and dimensional changes of endodontic sealers after a solubility challenge: a micro‐CT approach , 2017, International endodontic journal.

[4]  M. Marques,et al.  Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[5]  J. Granjeiro,et al.  Long-Term Cytotoxicity, pH and Dissolution Rate of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex. , 2016, Brazilian dental journal.

[6]  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva,et al.  Influence of Endodontic Treatment and Coronal Restoration on Status of Periapical Tissues: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  J. Barros,et al.  Antibacterial, physicochemical and mechanical properties of endodontic sealers containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles. , 2014, International endodontic journal.

[8]  B. Gomes,et al.  Evaluation of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer MTA Fillapex. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  J. V. Baldi,et al.  Variability of physicochemical properties of an epoxy resin sealer taken from different parts of the same tube. , 2012, International endodontic journal.

[10]  B. Gomes,et al.  Evaluation of cytotoxicity and up-regulation of gelatinases in human fibroblast cells by four root canal sealers. , 2012, International endodontic journal.

[11]  R. A. Bernardes,et al.  Influence of calcium hydroxide association on the physical properties of AH Plus. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  L. Tjäderhane,et al.  Long-term sealing ability of resin-based root canal fillings. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[13]  M. H. Duarte,et al.  Influence of calcium hydroxide addition to AH Plus sealer on its biocompatibility. , 2010, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  I. G. Moraes,et al.  Evaluation of the flow rate of 3 endodontic sealers: Sealer 26, AH Plus, and MTA Obtura. , 2010, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[15]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[16]  R. Holland,et al.  Calcium salts deposition in rat connective tissue after the implantation of calcium hydroxide-containing sealers. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.