Microhomology-mediated End Joining and Homologous Recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells

Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is a major pathway for Ku-independent alternative nonhomologous end joining, which contributes to chromosomal translocations and telomere fusions, but the underlying mechanism of MMEJ in mammalian cells is not well understood. In this study, we demonstrated that, distinct from Ku-dependent classical nonhomologous end joining, MMEJ—even with very limited end resection—requires cyclin-dependent kinase activities and increases significantly when cells enter S phase. We also showed that MMEJ shares the initial end resection step with homologous recombination (HR) by requiring meiotic recombination 11 homolog A (Mre11) nuclease activity, which is needed for subsequent recruitment of Bloom syndrome protein (BLM) and exonuclease 1 (Exo1) to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to promote extended end resection and HR. MMEJ does not require S139-phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), suggesting that initial end resection likely occurs at DSB ends. Using a MMEJ and HR competition repair substrate, we demonstrated that MMEJ with short end resection is used in mammalian cells at the level of 10–20% of HR when both HR and nonhomologous end joining are available. Furthermore, MMEJ is used to repair DSBs generated at collapsed replication forks. These studies suggest that MMEJ not only is a backup repair pathway in mammalian cells, but also has important physiological roles in repairing DSBs to maintain cell viability, especially under genomic stress.

[1]  Marco Foiani,et al.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1 , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  Sang Eun Lee,et al.  Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 Proteins Define a Ku-Independent Mechanism To Repair Double-Strand Breaks Lacking Overlapping End Sequences , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  Sang Eun Lee,et al.  Sgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends , 2008, Cell.

[5]  R. Kanaar,et al.  The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  Michael M. Murphy,et al.  IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway , 2007, Nature.

[7]  P. Calsou,et al.  Involvement of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA Ligase III in an Alternative Route for DNA Double-strand Breaks Rejoining* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  M. McVey,et al.  MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[9]  J. Petrini,et al.  Srs2 and Sgs1 DNA Helicases Associate with Mre11 in Different Subcomplexes following Checkpoint Activation and CDK1-Mediated Srs2 Phosphorylation , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  T. Paull,et al.  Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5’ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  C. Desmaze,et al.  Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[12]  Jeremy M. Stark,et al.  Alternative-NHEJ Is a Mechanistically Distinct Pathway of Mammalian Chromosome Break Repair , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Linda Z. Shi,et al.  CtIP Protein Dimerization Is Critical for Its Recruitment to Chromosomal DNA Double-stranded Breaks* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  L. Truong,et al.  Dbf4 Is Direct Downstream Target of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) Protein to Regulate Intra-S-phase Checkpoint* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  M. Kupiec,et al.  The CDK regulates repair of double‐strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[16]  E. Brown,et al.  Tim–Tipin dysfunction creates an indispensible reliance on the ATR–Chk1 pathway for continued DNA synthesis , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  S. Jackson,et al.  DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. , 2008, Genes & development.

[18]  K. Cimprich,et al.  The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork. , 2007, DNA repair.

[19]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Lovastatin arrests CHO cells between the origin decision point and the restriction point , 2000, FEBS letters.

[20]  Xiaohua Wu,et al.  Cell Cycle-dependent Complex Formation of BRCA1·CtIP·MRN Is Important for DNA Double-strand Break Repair* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  F. Alt,et al.  Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[22]  T. Helleday,et al.  Hydroxyurea-Stalled Replication Forks Become Progressively Inactivated and Require Two Different RAD51-Mediated Pathways for Restart and Repair , 2010, Molecular cell.

[23]  Stephen P. Jackson,et al.  Human CtIP Mediates Cell Cycle Control of DNA End Resection and Double Strand Break Repair*S⃞ , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Catherine L. Guay,et al.  Analysis of MRE11's function in the 5′→3′ processing of DNA double-strand breaks , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  V. Costanzo,et al.  Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability , 2012, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[26]  M. Whitby,et al.  Cleavage of Model Replication Forks by Fission Yeast Mus81-Eme1 and Budding Yeast Mus81-Mms4 , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Huichen Wang,et al.  DNA ligase III as a candidate component of backup pathways of nonhomologous end joining. , 2005, Cancer research.

[28]  Maximina H. Yun,et al.  CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Junjie Chen,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control Requires CtIP, a Phosphorylation-Dependent Binding Partner of BRCA1 C-Terminal Domains , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[30]  M. Jasin,et al.  Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4/ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[32]  D. Ferguson,et al.  Mre11 Nuclease Activity Has Essential Roles in DNA Repair and Genomic Stability Distinct from ATM Activation , 2008, Cell.

[33]  Ralph Scully,et al.  Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative non-homologous end joining , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[34]  J. R. Ferguson,et al.  The Nuclease Activity of Mre11 Is Required for Meiosis but Not for Mating Type Switching, End Joining, or Telomere Maintenance , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[35]  D. Ferguson,et al.  Multiple functions of MRN in end-joining pathways during isotype class switching , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[36]  S. Jackson,et al.  Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. , 2011, Genes & development.

[37]  Jean Gautier,et al.  Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[38]  A. Multani,et al.  The function of classical and alternative non‐homologous end‐joining pathways in the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[39]  Paul Modrich,et al.  BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. , 2011, Genes & development.

[40]  M. Jasin,et al.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[41]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  A Backup DNA Repair Pathway Moves to the Forefront , 2007, Cell.

[42]  M. Lieber,et al.  Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining , 1997, Nature.

[43]  Rohit Prakash,et al.  Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, Nature.

[44]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  Pathways of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair during the Mammalian Cell Cycle , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[45]  J. Lupski,et al.  Mechanisms of change in gene copy number , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  M. Lieber,et al.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[47]  Paul Modrich,et al.  Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  L. Banaszynski,et al.  A Rapid, Reversible, and Tunable Method to Regulate Protein Function in Living Cells Using Synthetic Small Molecules , 2006, Cell.

[49]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[50]  Sang Eun Lee,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-Dependent Single-Strand DNA Formation at DNA Break Promotes Microhomology-Mediated End Joining , 2007, Genetics.

[51]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1‐dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2 , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[52]  T. Paull,et al.  The Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex and non-homologous end-joining of incompatible ends in S. cerevisiae. , 2005, DNA repair.