Indoor thermal environmental conditions near glazed facades with shading devices - Part II: Thermal comfort simulation and impact of glazing and shading properties

Abstract This second part of the study uses a validated dynamic building thermal model for perimeter zones with glass facades (described in Part I) and combines it with a transient two-node thermal comfort model. The objective is to investigate the impact of varying exterior climatic conditions, glazing properties and shading properties on indoor thermal comfort and heating demand in such spaces under the presence of transmitted solar radiation. It is evident that selecting appropriate fenestration components becomes a trade-off between energy, thermal comfort, and lighting needs. Facades with insulating and low transmittance glass create more comfortable and stable conditions; however, there is a relationship between lower transmittance of the glazing and increased demand of primary heating needed, as well as with lighting energy use. Regardless of glazing type, shading can improve comfort conditions by decreasing radiant temperature asymmetry and extremes in operative temperature. The results show that perimeter building zones with high-performance facades (glazing and shading) can maintain comfortable conditions and even eliminate the need for secondary perimeter heating in cold climates.

[1]  R. Dedear Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[2]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[3]  R. Andersen,et al.  Occupant performance and building energy consumption with different philosophies of determining acceptable thermal conditions , 2009 .

[4]  Ken Parsons,et al.  Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort and Performance , 1999 .

[5]  L. Berglund,et al.  A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment , 1986 .

[6]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: Window Systems for High-Performance Buildings by John Carmody, Stephen Selkowitz, Eleanor Lee, Dariush Arasteh, and Todd Wilmert. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004 , 2004 .

[7]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[8]  John Carmody,et al.  Window Systems for High-Performance Buildings , 2004 .

[9]  G. Rizzo,et al.  The calculation of the mean radiant temperature of a subject exposed to the solar radiation—a generalised algorithm , 2005 .

[10]  J. L. M. Hensen,et al.  Literature review on thermal comfort in transient conditions , 1990 .

[11]  V. Serra,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a climate façade: Energy efficiency and thermal comfort performance , 2010 .

[12]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Solar heat load on man , 1993, International journal of biometeorology.

[13]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[14]  A. P. Gagge,et al.  An Effective Temperature Scale Based on a Simple Model of Human Physiological Regulatiry Response , 1972 .

[15]  Radu Zmeureanu,et al.  Thermally acceptable temperature drifts can reduce the energy consumption for cooling in office buildings , 1992 .

[16]  Gail Brager,et al.  The adaptive model of thermal comfort and energy conservation in the built environment. , 2001 .

[17]  R. Yao,et al.  A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort – Adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV) , 2009 .

[18]  G. Cannistraro,et al.  Algorithms for the calculation of the mean projected area factors of seated and standing persons , 1991 .

[19]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Environmental Ergonomics XI , 2005 .

[20]  J Toftum,et al.  Human projected area factors for detailed direct and diffuse solar radiation analysis , 2004, International journal of biometeorology.

[21]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Window performance for human thermal comfort , 2006 .