Regime-dependent evaluation of accumulated precipitation in COSMO

Regime-dependent evaluation is a relatively new approach to assess model performance. It consists of classifying the model biases according to a discrete number of regimes and evaluating model output within each regime. In this paper, the regimes are firstly defined by the large-scale atmospheric circulation, based on the objective Jenkinson-Collison classification technique which distinguishes synoptic patterns by strength, direction and vorticity of the geostrophic flow. Eight directional and two vorticity circulation regimes (circulation types) are specified. In this way, it is possible to quantify the model performance for cases with for example westerly winds only, or with cyclonic circulation only. A second regime classification is based on temperature, which allows for detection of temperature-dependent model performance. Modelled accumulated precipitation (mm/6 h) is evaluated with rain gauges for the years 2007 and 2008. Two variants of the COSMO model are evaluated: a fine-resolution version (2.8 km, COSMO-DE) and a coarse-resolution version (7 km, COSMO-EU). In COSMO-EU, a windward/leeward effect becomes visible since circulation is related to dominant wind direction, hence to windward and lee side of orography. In COSMO-DE, no circulation dependent but a height-related bias is identified and further explored, making use of temperature-dependent evaluation which unveils a positive model bias related to solid precipitation.

[1]  Mike Hulme,et al.  A COMPARISON OF LAMB CIRCULATION TYPES WITH AN OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION SCHEME , 1993 .

[2]  George Tselioudis,et al.  The Radiative, Cloud, and Thermodynamic Properties of the Major Tropical Western Pacific Cloud Regimes , 2005 .

[3]  Boris Sevruk,et al.  The WMO precipitation measurement intercomparisons , 2009 .

[4]  C. Frei,et al.  Future change of precipitation extremes in Europe: Intercomparison of scenarios from regional climate models , 2006 .

[5]  C. Jakob CLOUD REGIMES, MODEL EVALUATION AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT , 2004 .

[6]  J. Steppeler,et al.  Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM , 2003 .

[7]  Christian Jakob,et al.  An Improved Strategy for the Evaluation of Cloud Parameterizations in GCMS , 2003 .

[8]  Towards a quality control of precipitation data , 2008 .

[9]  M. Baldauf,et al.  Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities , 2011 .

[10]  J. Kain,et al.  Sensitivity of Several Performance Measures to Displacement Error, Bias, and Event Frequency , 2006 .

[11]  C. Kottmeier,et al.  The convective and orographically-induced precipitation study: A research and development project of the world weather research program , 2008 .

[12]  Oleg A. Krasnov,et al.  Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations , 2007 .

[13]  P. Nurmi,et al.  Overview of methods for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts , 2008 .

[14]  S. Michaelides Precipitation: Advances in Measurement, Estimation and Prediction , 2008 .

[15]  Andreas Philipp,et al.  Classifications of Atmospheric Circulation Patterns , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Tiedtke A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .

[17]  Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations , 2007 .

[18]  Galina Dick,et al.  The general observation period 2007 within the priority program on quantitative precipitation forecasting: concept and first results , 2008 .