Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning

We recorded oculomotor scanpaths in a task that required individuals to scan through displays consisting of a small number (between 3 and 12) of near-identical items. The task required each item to be fixated at least once and our objective was to explore the principles governing the generation of scanpaths. In general the observers carried out the task efficiently, although omissions occurred quite frequently (about 25% of trials) in the 12-item case. Backtracking occurred rarely except in the case of immediate rescanning back to the previously fixated item. Such immediate backtracking occurred on about 4% of fixations and, in contrast to more distant backtracking, was not associated with increased errors. Evidence was found for both directional (raster-like) scanning strategies and scanning strategies based on the global external contour.

[1]  I. Hooge,et al.  Inhibition of saccade return (ISR): spatio-temporal properties of saccade programming , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  Z. Pylyshyn Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[3]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[4]  R. Klein,et al.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[5]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Fourth Purkinje image signals reveal eye-lens deviations and retinal image distortions during saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  I. Gilchrist,et al.  Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search , 2006 .

[8]  J Zihl,et al.  Patterns of oculomotor scanning in patients with unilateral posterior parietal or frontal lobe damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  A. Kramer,et al.  Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  T. Ormerod,et al.  Global perceptual processing in problem solving: The case of the traveling salesperson , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Visual Attention: The Active Vision Perspective , 2001 .

[13]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[14]  N. Mackworth,et al.  The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .

[15]  S. Tipper,et al.  Long-Term Inhibition of Return of Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[16]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[18]  G. Underwood Cognitive processes in eye guidance , 2005 .

[19]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[20]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[21]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[22]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Contrast, Probability, and Saccadic Latency Evidence for Independence of Detection and Decision , 2004, Current Biology.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: using time in visual selection , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Valerie Brown,et al.  Eye scanning of multi-element displays: II. Saccade planning , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  T. Ormerod,et al.  A model of human performance on the traveling salesperson problem , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[33]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Search has Memory , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  J. Schall Neural Basis of Saccade Target Selection , 1995, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[35]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  D. S. Wooding,et al.  Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[38]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Vision and Attention , 2001 .

[39]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[40]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search , 2000, Current Biology.

[41]  J. Findlay,et al.  Eye guidance and visual search , 1998 .

[42]  Johan Hulleman,et al.  What is “marked” in visual marking? evidence for effects of configuration in preview search , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  How Much Memory Does Oculomotor Search Have? , 2003, Psychological science.

[44]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .