Effect of honeycomb seals on loss characteristics in shroud cavities of an axial turbine

The loss in efficiency due to shroud leakage or tip clearance flow accounts for a substantial part of the overall losses in turbomachinery. It is important to identify the leakage loss characteristics in order to optimize turbomachinery. At present, little information is available in the open literature concerning the effect of honeycomb seals on the loss characteristics in shroud cavities of an axial turbine, despite of the widespread use of the honeycomb seals. Therefore, interaction between rotor labyrinth seal leakage flow with and without honeycomb facings and main flow is investigated to provide the loss characteristics of the mixing process of the re-entering leakage flow into the main flow. The effects of honeycomb seals on the flow in shroud cavities and interaction with the main flow are analyzed. An additional study on the impact of subtle shroud cavity exit geometry is also presented. The investigation results indicate that the honeycomb seal affects the over tip leakage flow and reduces mixing losses when compared to the solid labyrinth seal. The leakage flow interactions with the main flow have considerably changed the flow fields in the endwall regions. The proposed research reveals the effects of honeycomb seals on the loss characteristics in shroud cavities and the impact of subtle shroud cavity exit geometry, and it is helpful for the design optimization of turbomachinery.

[1]  Christian Lerner,et al.  The Influence of the Clearance of Shrouded Rotor Blades on the Development of the Flowfield and Losses in the Subsequent Stator , 2000 .

[2]  H. L. Stocker,et al.  Advanced Labyrinth Seal Design Performance for High Pressure Ratio Gas Turbines , 1975 .

[3]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Annular honeycomb seals: test results for leakage and rotordynamic coefficients. Comparisons to labyrinth and smooth configurations , 1989 .

[4]  Jochen Gier,et al.  Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine , 2005 .

[5]  A. Giboni,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation Into the Unsteady Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a 1.5-Stage Axial Turbine , 2004 .

[6]  Inga Mahle.  Improving the Interaction Between Leakage Flows and Main Flow in a Low Pressure Turbine , 2010 .

[7]  G. Gyarmathy,et al.  Flow Interaction From the Exit Cavity of an Axial Turbine Blade Row Labyrinth Seal , 2000 .

[8]  Aldo Rona,et al.  AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR OVER-SHROUD LEAKAGE LOSSES IN A SHROUDED TURBINE STAGE , 2007 .

[9]  Lidong He,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE SEALING PERFORMANCE FOR HONEYCOMB SEALS , 2004 .

[10]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Investigation of 3D Unsteady Flows in a Two-Stage Shrouded Axial Turbine Using Stereoscopic PIV and FRAP: Part II — Kinematics of Shroud Cavity Flow , 2006 .

[11]  H. Stoff,et al.  Incompressible flow in a labyrinth seal , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  R. J. Parker,et al.  Nonintrusive investigations into life-size labyrinth seal flow fields , 1989 .

[13]  John D. Denton,et al.  The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine , 2001 .

[14]  Sigmar Wittig,et al.  Influence of a Honeycomb Facing on the Heat Transfer in a Stepped Labyrinth Seal , 2000 .

[15]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Annular Honeycomb-Stator Turbulent Gas Seal Analysis Using a New Friction-Factor Model Based on Flat Plate Tests , 1994 .

[16]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[17]  John D. Denton,et al.  The 1993 IGTI Scholar Lecture: Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines , 1993 .

[18]  K. H. Wolff,et al.  Performance of Worn Labyrinth Seals , 1994 .

[19]  Sigmar Wittig,et al.  Influence of high rotational speeds on the heat transfer and discharge coefficients in labyrinth seals , 1992 .