Economic freedom ranking of 161 countries in year 2000: a minimum disagreement approach

Since 1995, the Heritage Foundation has published the economic freedom index for countries throughout the world. The fundamental challenge is how to objectively measure economic freedom so that the index can be fair, credible and has the least disagreements among all countries. In this paper, we propose a new approach to construct economic freedom ranking which minimizes disagreements among countries. The mathematical model consists of two stages: (1) calculate the set of weights for each country which would give each country the best ranking, and (2) aggregation of ranks from all countries to minimize their disagreements. We apply the model to the data set of year 2000 on Economic Freedom from the Heritage Foundation, and find that the minimum disagreements from the proposed ranking improves by 9%.

[1]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Using DEA for planning in UK universities—an institutional perspective , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[3]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[4]  L. Seiford,et al.  Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation , 1978 .

[5]  S. Zenios,et al.  Operations, Quality, and Profitability in the Provision of Banking Services , 1999 .

[6]  Yasar A. Ozcan,et al.  Provider experience and technical efficiency in the treatment of stroke patients: DEA approach , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  John S. Edwards,et al.  Group preference aggregation rules: The results of a comparative analysis with in situ data , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Jean-Marie Blin,et al.  A linear assignment formulation of the multiattribute decision problem , 1976 .

[9]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Ordinal Information and Preference Structures: Decision Models and Applications , 1992 .

[10]  Erik Mathijs,et al.  Production Organization and Efficiency During Transition: An Empirical Analysis of East German Agriculture , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[11]  H. Leibenstein,et al.  Empirical Estimation and Partitioning of X-Inefficiency: A Data-Envelopment Approach , 1992 .

[12]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  Efficiency, size, benchmarks and targets for bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..