Culture and Status-Related Behavior: Japanese and American Perceptions of Interaction in Asymmetric Dyads

In examining the pattern of status-related behavior in the United States and Japan, the authors compared perceptions of verbal and nonverbal behaviors of lower and higher status people in asymmetric dyadic interaction using 105 behavioral scales. A similar gap was found between perceptions of behavior of lower and higher status people in both cultures, suggesting that this status-related behavior follows a fundamental pattern probably common across cultures. Nevertheless, culture appears to affect the magnitude at which status-related behavior is manifested. In Japan, a hierarchical, collectivist, tight, and high-context culture, the authors found perceptions of greater differences in the behavior of lower and higher status people than in the United States, a more egalitarian, individualist, and low-context culture. The sources and implications of this general pattern of status-related behavior and its cross-cultural differences are discussed.

[1]  Hiroshi Mannari,et al.  The Challenge of Japan's Internationalization: Organization and Culture. , 1985, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[2]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior , 1985 .

[3]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  H Morsbach,et al.  Aspects of nonverbal communication in Japan. , 1973, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[5]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[6]  T. Maple,et al.  Dominance in Nonhuman Primates , 1985 .

[7]  P. Ekman.  Movements with Precise Meanings , 1976 .

[8]  William B. Gudykunst.  Communication in Japan and the United States , 1993 .

[9]  J. Butcher.  International adaptations of the MMPI-2 : research and clinical applications , 1996 .

[10]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[11]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior: Basic Concepts and Issues , 1985 .

[12]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[13]  Methods of establishing cross-cultural equivalence. , 1996 .

[14]  H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance. , 1982 .

[15]  Edwin O. Reischauer.  The Japanese Today: Change and Continuity , 1977 .

[16]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[17]  Judith A. Hall.  Touch, status, and gender at professional meetings , 1996 .

[18]  William T. Packwood.  Loudness as a Variable in Persuasion. , 1974 .

[19]  C. King,et al.  The Dance of Life , 1923, Nature.

[20]  M. Patterson,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior: A Functional Perspective. , 1984 .

[21]  P. J. Pelto,et al.  The differences between “tight” and “loose” societies , 1968 .

[22]  R. C. Durfee,et al.  MULTIPLE FACTOR ANALYSIS. , 1967 .

[23]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[24]  Graham Fk,et al.  Performance of brain-damaged cases on a memory-for-designs test. , 1946 .

[25]  R. Sommer,et al.  Seating arrangements and status. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Richard M. Sorrentino,et al.  The effect of quantity and quality of verbal interaction on ratings of leadership ability , 1975 .

[27]  J. Jaffe,et al.  Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  R. Krauss,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior and Nonverbal Communication: What do Conversational Hand Gestures Tell Us? , 1996 .

[29]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .