Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (The QuaMaDi Project)

As many breast cancer cases are detected outside mammographic screening, a multidisciplinary quality management (QuaMaDi) project involving gynaecologists, double reading by radiologists. and centralised assessment, documentation, evaluation and feedback was implemented into routine breast cancer diagnosis in part of Schleswig-Holstein (Germany) with a population of 365 000 women. A cohort of 59 514 patients eligible for diagnostic mammography was examined from May 2001 to December 2005 and quality indicators, breast cancer incidence and tumour stage distribution were analysed. A total of 102 744 diagnostic processes were initiated, for 23.8% of which (24 470) a third expert reading at the reference centre was performed. Further assessment was recommended for 6.3% (6442) of all patients. In total, 1056 breast cancer cases were diagnosed (10.3 per 1000 examinations). Patients of the QuaMaDi project had a higher proportion of ‘in situ’ and T1 tumours (62.6% vs Schleswig-Holstein: 48.6%), showing that the implementation of high standards in routine diagnostic mammography can improve the quality of breast cancer diagnosis and care.

[1]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening , 2003, The Lancet.

[2]  Pierre Y. Julien Annual Review 2004 , 2004 .

[3]  J. Hendriks,et al.  © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Article no. bjoc.1999.0786 Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening , 2022 .

[4]  M. Hakama,et al.  Process indicators from ten centres in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme from 1991 to 2000. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[5]  U. Albert,et al.  Short Version of the Guideline: Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Germany , 2004, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[6]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in The Netherlands. , 2001, Breast.

[7]  J. Hilden,et al.  Performance of clinical mammography: A nationwide study from Denmark , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[8]  H. Junkermann,et al.  Konzept und Durchführung der Modellprojekte für Mammographiescreening in Deutschland , 2001, Der Radiologe.

[9]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme , 2005, Journal of medical screening.

[10]  A. Hackshaw,et al.  EUSOMA review of mammography screening. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  N. Perry,et al.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening , 1996 .

[12]  Jessica W T Leung,et al.  Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[14]  Jan Mæhlen,et al.  Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  S. Taplin,et al.  Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[16]  A. Verbeek,et al.  Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screening programme. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  S. Taplin,et al.  Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries. , 2002, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.