Bayesian model for detection and classification of meningioma nuclei in microscopic images

Image segmentation aims to determine structures of interest inside a digital picture in biomedical sciences. State‐of‐the art automatic methods however still fail to provide the segmentation quality achievable by humans who employ expert knowledge and use software to mark target structures on an image. Manual segmentation is time‐consuming, tedious and suffers from interoperator variability, thus not serving the requirements of daily use well. Therefore, the approach presented here abandons the goal of full‐fledged segmentation and settles for the localization of circular objects in photographs (10 training images and 20 testing images with several hundreds of nuclei each). A fully trainable softcore interaction point process model was hence fit to the most likely locations of nuclei of meningioma cells. The Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection/SIMCEP data set of virtual cells served as controls. A ‘colour deconvolution’ algorithm was integrated to determine (based on anti‐Ki67 immunohistochemistry) which real cells might have the potential to proliferate. In addition, a density parameter of the underlying Bayesian model was estimated. Immunohistochemistry results were ‘simulated'for the virtual cells. The system yielded true positive (TP) rates in the detection and classification of real nuclei and their virtual counterparts. These hits outnumbered those obtained from the public domain image processing software ImageJ by 10%. The method introduced here can be trained to function not only in medicine and morphology‐based systems biology but in other application domains as well. The algorithm lends itself to an automated approach that constitutes a valuable tool which is easy to use and generates acceptable results quickly.

[1]  [Virtual tissue. Quaoaring]. , 2008, Der Pathologe.

[2]  P Kronqvist,et al.  Ki67 immunohistochemistry: a valuable marker in prognostication but with a risk of misclassification: proliferation subgroups formed based on Ki67 immunoreactivity and standardized mitotic index , 2006, Histopathology.

[3]  M. N. M. van Lieshout,et al.  Object recognition using Markov spatial processes , 1992, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol.II. Conference B: Pattern Recognition Methodology and Systems.

[4]  R. Malladi,et al.  Segmentation of nuclei and cells using membrane related protein markers , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  A. Groh,et al.  Signaltheoretische Analyse histologischer Daten im Ortsfrequenzraum , 2008, Der Pathologe.

[6]  W Feiden,et al.  Automated nuclear segmentation in the determination of the Ki-67 labeling index in meningiomas. , 2006, Clinical neuropathology.

[7]  I. Kill Localisation of the Ki-67 antigen within the nucleolus. Evidence for a fibrillarin-deficient region of the dense fibrillar component. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[8]  S. Uppin,et al.  Meningiomas: correlation of Ki67 with histological grade. , 2011, Neurology India.

[9]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[10]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation , 2012, Nature Methods.

[11]  Luca Fiaschi,et al.  Learning-based mitotic cell detection in histopathological images , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[12]  J. Møller,et al.  Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes , 2003 .

[13]  Siegfried J. Pöppl,et al.  The 'subsequent artificial neural network' (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analyses , 2004, Bioinform..

[14]  K. Zang,et al.  Histopathologic indicators of recurrence in meningiomas: correlation with clinical and genetic parameters , 2006, Virchows Archiv.

[15]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Statistical image analysis for a confocal microscopy two‐dimensional section of cartilage growth , 2004 .

[16]  F. Lacombe,et al.  The labelling of proliferating cells by Ki67 and MIB-1 antibodies depends on the binding of a nuclear protein to the DNA. , 1994, Experimental cell research.

[17]  Mathias Wagner,et al.  Computation of a finite element-conformal tetrahedral mesh approximation for simulated soft tissue deformation using a deformable surface model , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[18]  A mathematical model of immunohistochemical preparations, which provides quantitative predictions , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  Florence Cloppet,et al.  Segmentation of complex nucleus configurations in biological images , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  E. Davison Simulation of cell behavior: normal and abnormal growth. , 1975, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[21]  Joakim Lindblad,et al.  Robust Cell Image Segmentation Methods , 2004 .

[22]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[23]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[24]  Jens Vygen,et al.  The Book Review Column1 , 2020, SIGACT News.

[25]  Thomas M. Breuel,et al.  Spatial Statistics for Tumor Cell Counting and Classification , 2009, DAGM-Symposium.

[26]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[27]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  A Marked Point Process of Rectangles and Segments for Automatic Analysis of Digital Elevation Models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  K Masaoka,et al.  The finite element analysis of brain oedema associated with intracranial meningiomas. , 1990, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[29]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis , 2003, Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[30]  J J Vaquero,et al.  Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. , 1998, Cytometry.

[31]  J Lojk,et al.  Comparison of two automatic cell‐counting solutions for fluorescent microscopic images , 2015, Journal of microscopy.

[32]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[33]  Andreas Schröder,et al.  Finite element simulation of skeletal muscular structures obtained from images of histological serial sections. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Pekka Ruusuvuori,et al.  Benchmark set of synthetic images for validating cell image analysis algorithms , 2008, 2008 16th European Signal Processing Conference.

[35]  M. Samii,et al.  The Ki-67 proliferation antigen in meningiomas. Experience in 600 cases , 2004, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[36]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  Marked point process in image analysis , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[37]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[38]  D. Seigneurin,et al.  Quantification and topographical description of Ki-67 antibody labelling during the cell cycle of normal fibroblastic (MRC-5) and mammary tumour cell lines (MCF-7). , 1989, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.