How to Better Target and Incent Paid Endorsers in Social Advertising Campaigns: A Field Experiment

We investigate paid endorsement as a crowd-sourcing social advertising mechanism that allows advertisers to bypass publishers (e.g., Facebook) and recruit individual endorsers of their own choice at affordable prices. Specifically, we investigate (i) how incentives affect endorsers’ participation and effectiveness, (ii) what types of endorsers are most effective in generating online engagement (likes, comments, and retweets), and (iii) the potential differences between generating different types of engagements. We conduct a large scale field experiment in which we manipulate exogenously pay rates and eligibility to participate. Our findings suggest that increasing financial incentive doesn’t necessarily improve participation rate. In addition, endorsers who are effective are often not responsive. Further, it can be misleading to assess the attractiveness of endorsers simply based on observed engagements. Our findings provide new insights on how marketers can improve the effectiveness of paid endorsement by identifying and incentivizing high potential endorsers.

[1]  Rainer Winkelmann,et al.  Count Data Models with Selectivity , 1998 .

[2]  Yu-Wei Chuang,et al.  Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of KMS quality, KMS self-efficacy, and organizational climate , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[3]  Anja S. Göritz,et al.  Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review , 2006 .

[4]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[5]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[6]  M. Gilly,et al.  We Are What We Post? Self‐Presentation in Personal Web Space , 2003 .

[7]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Content Sharing in a Social Broadcasting Environment: Evidence from Twitter , 2014, MIS Q..

[8]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites , 2011 .

[9]  William H. Greene,et al.  Models for count data with endogenous participation , 2009 .

[10]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter? , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Patrick A. Puhani,et al.  The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique - A Short Survey , 2000 .

[12]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[13]  Victoria D. Bush,et al.  What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2014 .

[14]  Thomas V. Pollet,et al.  Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[15]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share , 2013 .

[16]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  David S. Cantor,et al.  The Use of Monetary Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Random Digit Dial Telephone Surveys , 2007 .

[18]  Eleanor Singer,et al.  The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys , 2013 .

[19]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  The strength of weak conversational ties in the flow of information and influence , 1983 .

[20]  A. H. Church.  ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[21]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Quality management on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, HCOMP '10.

[22]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[23]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  Pradeep Racherla,et al.  What We Know and Don’t Know About Online Word-Of-Mouth: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2012 .

[25]  M. Sarvary,et al.  Network Effects and Personal Influences: The Diffusion of an Online Social Network , 2011 .

[26]  Moira Burke.  Reading, Writing, Relationships: The Impact of Social Network Sites on Relationships and Well-Being , 2011 .

[27]  Cindy Chan,et al.  Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share , 2014 .

[28]  C. Midden,et al.  Communication Network Influences on Information Diffusion and Persuasion , 1991 .

[29]  William Kruskal,et al.  When are Gauss-Markov and Least Squares Estimators Identical? A Coordinate-Free Approach , 1968 .

[30]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  A COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT QUADRATURE PROCEDURE FOR THE ONE-FACTOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL , 1982 .

[31]  Hema Yoganarasimhan,et al.  Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data , 2011, Quantitative Marketing and Economics.

[32]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  Stephen R. Porter,et al.  The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates , 2003 .

[34]  Meredith Minkler,et al.  Community Organizing and Community Building for Health and Welfare , 2012 .