An energy- and depth-dependent model for x-ray imaging.

In this paper, we model an x-ray imaging system, paying special attention to the energy- and depth-dependent characteristics of the inputs and interactions: x rays are polychromatic, interaction depth and conversion to optical photons is energy-dependent, optical scattering and the collection efficiency depend on the depth of interaction. The model we construct is a random function of the point process that begins with the distribution of x rays incident on the phosphor and ends with optical photons being detected by the active area of detector pixels to form an image. We show how the point-process representation can be used to calculate the characteristic statistics of the model. We then simulate a Gd2O2S:Tb phosphor, estimate its characteristic statistics, and proceed with a signal-detection experiment to investigate the impact of the pixel fill factor on detecting spherical calcifications (the signal). The two extremes possible from this experiment are that SNR2 does not change with fill factor or changes in proportion to fill factor. In our results, the impact of fill factor is between these extremes, and depends on the diameter of the signal.

[1]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Correlated point processes in radiological imaging , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Effect on DQE of screen energy weighting in mammography , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  W. H. McMaster,et al.  COMPILATION OF X-RAY CROSS SECTIONS. SECTION III. , 1969 .

[4]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Brandon D. Gallas.  Variance of the channelized-hotelling observer from a finite number of trainers and testers , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  R. K. Swank.  Absorption and noise in x‐ray phosphors , 1973 .

[7]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  J. Baró,et al.  PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter , 1995 .

[9]  Martin J. Berger,et al.  Stopping powers and ranges of electrons and positrons , 1982 .

[10]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Model of the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens. , 1990, Medical physics.

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Effect of viewing angle on visual detection in liquid crystal displays , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  T R Fewell,et al.  A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra. , 1978, Radiology.

[14]  M L Giger,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast. , 1985, Medical physics.

[15]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[16]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  R. Shaw,et al.  Evaluating the efficient of imaging processes , 1978 .

[18]  H. Hotelling.  The Generalization of Student’s Ratio , 1931 .

[19]  A. Badano.  Optical blur and collection efficiency in columnar phosphors for X-ray imaging , 2003 .

[20]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  SNR and DQE analysis of broad spectrum X-ray imaging , 1985 .

[21]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Optical efficiency of image sensor pixels. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Flat Panel Detectors for Digital Radiography , 2000 .

[24]  Rodney Shaw,et al.  Signal-to-noise optimization of medical imaging systems , 1999 .

[25]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[26]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Assessment of lesion detectability of Monte Carlo modeling of digital radiography systems , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  M. Rabbani,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of imaging systems with amplifying and scattering mechanisms. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  N. Wiener.  Generalized harmonic analysis , 1930 .

[29]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Nodule detection in two-component noise: toward patient structure , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[30]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[32]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[33]  M. Giger,et al.  Effect of pixel size on detectability of low-contrast signals in digital radiography. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  C Abbey,et al.  Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. , 1999, Optics express.

[35]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[36]  David P. Trauernicht,et al.  The Measurement Of Conversion Noise In X-Ray Intensifying Screens , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[37]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. I. Flat background and deterministic blurring. , 2004, Medical physics.

[38]  G. Lubberts,et al.  Random Noise Produced by X-Ray Fluorescent Screens* , 1968 .

[39]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[40]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. II. Cascade model analysis. , 2003, Medical physics.

[41]  W. Shockley,et al.  A Theory of Noise for Electron Multipliers , 1938, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers.

[42]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[43]  R. Shaw,et al.  The Equivalent Quantum Efficiency of the Photographic Process , 1963 .

[44]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[45]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[46]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[47]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[48]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[49]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit. , 2003, Medical physics.

[50]  R. Fisher.  THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[51]  R Van Metter,et al.  An application of multivariate moment-generating functions to the analysis of signal and noise propagation in radiographic screen-film systems. , 1990, Medical physics.

[52]  Richard L. Van Metter,et al.  Conversion noise measurement for front and back x-ray intensifying screens , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[53]  E. Fortunato,et al.  High quality a-Si:H films for MIS device applications , 2002 .

[54]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Lubberts effect in columnar phosphors. , 2004, Medical physics.

[55]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.