Road Safety Performance Indicators and Their Explanatory Value: A Critical View Based on the Experience of Central European Countries

Counts of road crashes and their victims represent essential information for road safety practitioners allowing them to analyse their spatial and temporal aspects. However, they cannot provide details on the factors causing road crashes. As a result, various road safety performance indicators (RSPIs) were introduced, making it possible to gather information on the effectiveness of interventions on road safety in given areas. However, analysis of the trends in road casualties in several Central European countries based on safety performance (measured by RSPIs) suggest that not even these indicators can provide full understanding of road safety trends, and, if they are applied generally without the required background information, this could even lead to serious misinterpretation of the trends in road casualties. Sudden breaks in long-term trends seem to be linked to the transition process and to certain legislative reforms. The exposure and socio-economic climate appear to have had a major impact on road crash outcomes. Various additional indicators describing organisational and structural aspects may be helpful, therefore, in better understanding and predicting the development in road safety for individual countries.

[1]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  An Introduction to State Space Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[2]  Vojtech Eksler.  Road mortality in Europe : a regional approach , 2009 .

[3]  J. Żukowska.  Traffic risk modelling using time-series , 2002 .

[4]  Susan C. Partyka,et al.  SIMPLE MODELS OF FATALITY TRENDS USING EMPLOYMENT AND POPULATION DATA , 1984 .

[5]  Matthijs J. Koornstra.  Prediction of traffic fatalities and prospects for mobility becoming sustainable-safe , 2007 .

[6]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods , 2001 .

[7]  R Allsop,et al.  2010 on the horizon: 3rd road safety PIN report , 2009 .

[8]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Road Safety Performance Indicators: Theory. Deliverable D3.6 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. , 2007 .

[9]  Fred Wegman,et al.  SUNflower+6: a comparative study of the development of road safety in the SUNflower+6 countries , 2005 .

[10]  F Wegman,et al.  IMPLEMENTING, MONITORING, EVALUATING, AND UPDATING A ROAD SAFETY PROGRAMME: CONTRIBUTION TO THE BEST IN EUROPE 2003 CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN TRANSPORT SAFETY COUNCIL: TARGETED ROAD SAFETY PROGRAMMES IN THE EU, JUNE 10, 2003, BRUSSELS , 2003 .

[11]  Rune Elvik,et al.  An evaluation of the Power Model , 2004 .

[12]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter , 1990 .

[13]  Robert Raeside,et al.  ROAD ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEPRIVATION , 1997 .

[14]  S C Partyka.  Simple models of fatality trends revisited seven years later. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Speed and road accidents : an evaluation of the power model , 2004 .

[16]  F Wegman,et al.  SUNFLOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENTS OF ROAD SAFETY IN SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM, AND THE NETHERLANDS , 2002 .

[17]  Göran Nilsson,et al.  Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety , 2004 .

[18]  Fred Wegman,et al.  SUNflowerNext: Towards A Composite Road Safety Performance Index , 2008 .

[19]  F Wegman.  (ROAD ACCIDENTS: WORLDWIDE A PROBLEM THAT CAN BE TACKLED SUCCESSFULLY) , 1996 .

[20]  Max Cameron,et al.  Linking economic activity, road safety countermeasures and other factors with the Victorian road toll , 1992 .