Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction

The architecture of mutualistic networks facilitates coexistence of individual participants by minimizing competition relative to facilitation. However, it is not known whether this benefit is received by each participant node in proportion to its overall contribution to network persistence. This issue is critical to understanding the trade-offs faced by individual nodes in a network. We address this question by applying a suite of structural and dynamic methods to an ensemble of flowering plant/insect pollinator networks. Here we report two main results. First, nodes contribute heterogeneously to the overall nested architecture of the network. From simulations, we confirm that the removal of a strong contributor tends to decrease overall network persistence more than the removal of a weak contributor. Second, strong contributors to collective persistence do not gain individual survival benefits but are in fact the nodes most vulnerable to extinction. We explore the generality of these results to other cooperative networks by analysing a 15-year time series of the interactions between designer and contractor firms in the New York City garment industry. As with the ecological networks, a firm's survival probability decreases as its individual nestedness contribution increases. Our results, therefore, introduce a new paradox into the study of the persistence of cooperative networks, and potentially address questions about the impact of invasive species in ecological systems and new competitors in economic systems.

[1]  Peter B. Doeringer,et al.  Can Fast Fashion Save the Us Apparel Industry , 2006 .

[2]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks , 2009, Nature.

[4]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[8]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Disentangling the Web of Life , 2009, Science.

[9]  Guido Nassimbeni,et al.  Supply networks: Genesis, stability and logistics implications. A comparative analysis of two districts , 1995 .

[10]  M. Westoby,et al.  Plant height and evolutionary games , 2003 .

[11]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[12]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Mutually-antagonistic interactions in baseball networks , 2009, 0907.5241.

[13]  E. Leigh,et al.  How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group? , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Ecology for bankers , 2008, Nature.

[15]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Cooperative network dynamics , 2009, Nature.

[16]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[17]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk in banking ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[18]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[19]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life , 2006 .

[20]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[21]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Asymmetric disassembly and robustness in declining networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.