Small Networks but not Small Worlds: Unique Aspects of Food Web Structure

Contrary to prior reports, we find that a set of 16 food webs, with 25 to 172 nodes, from a variety of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, generally display neither Òsmall-worldÓ nor Òscale-freeÓ topological properties. The food webs do display relatively short characteristic path lengths consistent with small-world topology. However, most food webs display less clustering than that expected in small-world networks, which appears related to the small size of food webs. The ratio of observed to random clustering coefficients across biological and non-biological networks increases linearly with network size over 7 orders of magnitude (r = 0.90). A 1:1 clustering ratio occurs in networks with ~40 nodes. Most food webs display single-scale exponential or uniform degree distributions rather than the scale-free, power-law distributions previously reported for food webs and many other networks. Uniform degree distributions have not been reported previously for real-world networks. The failure to observe scale-free topology in most food webs appears related to the relatively small size, high connectance, and differences in the assembly of food webs compared to other real-world networks.

[1]  Robert M. May,et al.  The Search for Patterns in the Balance of Nature: Advances and Retreats , 1986 .

[2]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The Web as a Graph: Measurements, Models, and Methods , 1999, COCOON.

[3]  Neo D. Martinez Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web , 1991 .

[4]  Lada A. Adamic The Small World Web , 1999, ECDL.

[5]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a comparison of introduced and native trees , 1980 .

[6]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .

[7]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities , 1987 .

[8]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[9]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[10]  S. Levin THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[11]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of a freshwater food web , 1989 .

[12]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Weighted evolving networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  H. Cornell,et al.  Accumulation of Native Parasitoid Species on Introduced Herbivores: A Comparison of Hosts as Natives and Hosts as Invaders , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[14]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Connectance in real biotic communities and critical values for stability of model ecosystems , 1979, Nature.

[15]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web , 2000, Science.

[17]  R. Paine Road Maps of Interactions or Grist for Theoretical Development , 1988 .

[18]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[19]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Food web patterns and their consequences , 1991, Nature.

[21]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[23]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Trophic links of community food webs. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[25]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Effect of scale on food web structure. , 1993, Science.

[26]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[27]  Ramon Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  The small world of human language , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.