An Adhesion-Dependent Switch between Mechanisms That Determine Motile Cell Shape

Keratocytes are fast-moving cells in which adhesion dynamics are tightly coupled to the actin polymerization motor that drives migration, resulting in highly coordinated cell movement. We have found that modifying the adhesive properties of the underlying substrate has a dramatic effect on keratocyte morphology. Cells crawling at intermediate adhesion strengths resembled stereotypical keratocytes, characterized by a broad, fan-shaped lamellipodium, clearly defined leading and trailing edges, and persistent rates of protrusion and retraction. Cells at low adhesion strength were small and round with highly variable protrusion and retraction rates, and cells at high adhesion strength were large and asymmetrical and, strikingly, exhibited traveling waves of protrusion. To elucidate the mechanisms by which adhesion strength determines cell behavior, we examined the organization of adhesions, myosin II, and the actin network in keratocytes migrating on substrates with different adhesion strengths. On the whole, our results are consistent with a quantitative physical model in which keratocyte shape and migratory behavior emerge from the self-organization of actin, adhesions, and myosin, and quantitative changes in either adhesion strength or myosin contraction can switch keratocytes among qualitatively distinct migration regimes.

[1]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling via network disassembly , 2010, Nature.

[2]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Force transmission in migrating cells , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[4]  E Ruoslahti,et al.  RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[5]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Shiro Suetsugu,et al.  WAVE, a novel WASP‐family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[7]  Kinneret Keren,et al.  The Shape of Motile Cells , 2009, Current Biology.

[8]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[9]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[10]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Lamellipodial Actin Mechanically Links Myosin Activity with Adhesion-Site Formation , 2007, Cell.

[11]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Actin–myosin network reorganization breaks symmetry at the cell rear to spontaneously initiate polarized cell motility , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[13]  H. B. Goodrich CELL BEHAVIOR IN TISSUE CULTURES , 1924 .

[14]  K. Endlich,et al.  Movement of stress fibers away from focal adhesions identifies focal adhesions as sites of stress fiber assembly in stationary cells. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[15]  G. Somero,et al.  Influences of thermal acclimation and acute temperature change on the motility of epithelial wound-healing cells (keratocytes) of tropical, temperate and Antarctic fish , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  G. Oster,et al.  Cell motility driven by actin polymerization. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[17]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Maximal migration of human smooth muscle cells on fibronectin and type IV collagen occurs at an intermediate attachment strength , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  T. Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[19]  D. Taylor,et al.  Modulation of contraction by gelation/solation in a reconstituted motile model , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  G. Danuser,et al.  Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Takayuki Kato,et al.  Cooperation between mDia1 and ROCK in Rho-induced actin reorganization , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  T. Stradal,et al.  Protein complexes regulating Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  Janos Vörös,et al.  RGD-grafted poly-L-lysine-graft-(polyethylene glycol) copolymers block non-specific protein adsorption while promoting cell adhesion. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  M. Gardel,et al.  PyK2 and FAK connections to p190Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor regulate RhoA activity, focal adhesion formation, and cell motility , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  T. Takenawa,et al.  IRSp53 is an essential intermediate between Rac and WAVE in the regulation of membrane ruffling , 2000, Nature.

[28]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Differential Transmission of Actin Motion Within Focal Adhesions , 2007, Science.

[29]  A. Carlsson Contractile stress generation by actomyosin gels. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[31]  E. Fama,et al.  Migration , 2007 .

[32]  L. Addadi,et al.  Hierarchical assembly of cell-matrix adhesion complexes. , 2004, Biochemical Society transactions.

[33]  Alberto Aliseda,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of eukaryotic cell motility by improved force cytometry , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Christoph Ballestrem,et al.  Marching at the front and dragging behind , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Erratum: Integrin–ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell–substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[36]  J. Spatz,et al.  Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[37]  Roger Lui,et al.  Exploring the control circuit of cell migration by mathematical modeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Timothy J Mitchison,et al.  Dissecting Temporal and Spatial Control of Cytokinesis with a Myosin II Inhibitor , 2003, Science.

[39]  S. Watabe,et al.  Calcium-independent activation of contractile apparatus in smooth muscle by calyculin-A. , 1989, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[40]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Microcontact printing of novel co-polymers in combination with proteins for cell-biological applications. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[41]  D. Schlaepfer,et al.  Direct Interaction of Focal Adhesion Kinase with p190RhoGEF* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  J. Theriot,et al.  Biophysical Aspects of Actin-Based Cell Motility in Fish Epithelial Keratocytes , 2008 .

[43]  Chris H Wiggins,et al.  Lateral membrane waves constitute a universal dynamic pattern of motile cells. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[44]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[45]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Regulation of cell movement is mediated by stretch-activated calcium channels , 1999, Nature.

[46]  Kozo Kaibuchi,et al.  Regulation of Myosin Phosphatase by Rho and Rho-Associated Kinase (Rho-Kinase) , 1996, Science.

[47]  A. Huttenlocher,et al.  Modulation of cell migration by integrin-mediated cytoskeletal linkages and ligand-binding affinity , 1996, Journal of Cell Biology.

[48]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Analysis of the Actin–Myosin II System in Fish Epidermal Keratocytes: Mechanism of Cell Body Translocation , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Spatiotemporal Feedback between Actomyosin and Focal-Adhesion Systems Optimizes Rapid Cell Migration , 2006, Cell.

[50]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Stochastic Model of Integrin-Mediated Signaling and Adhesion Dynamics at the Leading Edges of Migrating Cells , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  H. Busscher,et al.  Thermodynamic aspects of cell spreading on solid substrata , 1988, Cell Biophysics.

[52]  S. Itzkovitz,et al.  Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[53]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Principles of locomotion for simple-shaped cells , 1993, Nature.

[54]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  A correlation-based approach to calculate rotation and translation of moving cells , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[55]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth , 1988, Neuron.

[56]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[57]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues , 2009, PloS one.

[58]  E. Schaefer,et al.  Paxillin phosphorylation at Ser273 localizes a GIT1–PIX–PAK complex and regulates adhesion and protrusion dynamics , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[59]  S. Blystone,et al.  Purified Integrin Adhesion Complexes Exhibit Actin-Polymerization Activity , 2006, Current Biology.

[60]  Z. P. I N C U S,et al.  Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis , 2007 .

[61]  Zachary Pincus,et al.  Emergence of Large-Scale Cell Morphology and Movement from Local Actin Filament Growth Dynamics , 2007, PLoS biology.

[62]  K. Jacobson,et al.  The composition and dynamics of cell-substratum adhesions in locomoting fish keratocytes. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[63]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion , 2009, Nature.

[64]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Bipedal locomotion in crawling cells. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[65]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[66]  Marc W Kirschner,et al.  An Actin-Based Wave Generator Organizes Cell Motility , 2007, PLoS biology.

[67]  Ken Jacobson,et al.  Actin-myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[68]  Kurt I. Anderson,et al.  Contact dynamics during keratocyte motility , 2000, Current Biology.

[69]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Characteristics of a membrane reservoir buffering membrane tension. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[70]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[71]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Kinetic model for lamellipodal actin-integrin 'clutch' dynamics , 2008, Cell adhesion & migration.

[72]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule , 1984, Nature.

[73]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[74]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.