A comprehensive model to evaluate implementation of the world health organization framework convention of tobacco control

Background: Iran is one of the countries that has ratified the World Health Organization Framework Convention of Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC), and has implemented a series of tobacco control interventions including the Comprehensive Tobacco Control Law. Enforcement of this legislation and assessment of its outcome requires a dedicated evaluation system. This study aimed to develop a generic model to evaluate the implementation of the Comprehensive Tobacco Control Law in Iran that was provided based on WHO-FCTC articles. Materials and Methods: Using a grounded theory approach, qualitative data were collected from 265 subjects in individual interviews and focus group discussions with policymakers who designed the legislation, key stakeholders, and members of the target community. In addition, field observations data in supermarkets/shops, restaurants, teahouses and coffee shops were collected. Data were analyzed in two stages through conceptual theoretical coding. Findings: Overall, 617 open codes were extracted from the data into tables; 72 level-3 codes were retained from the level-2 code series. Using a Model Met paradigm, the relationships between the components of each paradigm were depicted graphically. The evaluation model entailed three levels, namely: short-term results, process evaluation and long-term results. Conclusions: Central concept of the process of evaluation is that enforcing the law influences a variety of internal and environmental factors including legislative changes. These factors will be examined during the process evaluation and context evaluation. The current model can be applicable for providing FCTC evaluation tools across other jurisdictions.

[1]  N. Burns,et al.  The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, & Utilization , 1987 .

[2]  D. Levy,et al.  Recent trends in smoking and the role of public policies: results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model. , 2005, Addiction.

[3]  Patricia A. McDaniel,et al.  Tobacco industry issues management organizations: Creating a global corporate network to undermine public health , 2008, Globalization and health.

[4]  A. Woodward,et al.  After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand , 2008, Tobacco Control.

[5]  N. Burns,et al.  Study guide for the practice of nursing research : conduct, critique and utilization , 1997 .

[6]  M. Cooley,et al.  Smoking cessation and lung cancer: oncology nurses can make a difference. , 2008, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[7]  Faye S. Taxman,et al.  Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology. , 2003, Evaluation and program planning.

[8]  D. Simpson,et al.  Tobacco: public perceptions and the role of the industry , 2003 .

[9]  M. Wakefield,et al.  Community perceptions about the tobacco industry and tobacco control funding , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[10]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[11]  R. Bailie,et al.  Evaluation of a multi‐component community tobacco intervention in three remote Australian Aboriginal communities , 2006, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  R. Goodman Principals and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs. , 1998, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[14]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[15]  Claudia M. Smith,et al.  Community/Public Health Nursing Practice: Health for Families and Populations , 2004 .