[The Additional Role of Symptom-Reflux Association Analysis of Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using Bravo Capsule pH Test].
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Pandolfino,et al. Functional Esophageal Disorders. , 2016, Gastroenterology.
[2] Yeong Yeh Lee,et al. Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using the Bravo Capsule pH System , 2015, Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility.
[3] T. Ang,et al. Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: establishing values in a multiracial cohort of asymptomatic Asian subjects. , 2013, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.
[4] Yanhong Deng,et al. 24 Versus 48-hour Bravo pH Monitoring , 2012, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.
[5] S. Roman,et al. Wireless pH capsule – yield in clinical practice , 2012, Endoscopy.
[6] M. Fox,et al. Prolonged, wireless pH‐studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24‐h catheter‐based pH‐studies , 2011, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.
[7] A. de Hoyos,et al. Technical problems produced by the Bravo pH test in nonerosive reflux disease patients. , 2010, World journal of gastroenterology.
[8] J. Pandolfino,et al. The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 2010, The American journal of medicine.
[9] T. Ang,et al. To Bravo or not? A comparison of wireless esophageal pH monitoring and conventional pH catheter to evaluate non‐erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in a multiracial Asian cohort , 2010, Journal of digestive diseases.
[10] R. Penagini,et al. Wireless pH monitoring: better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits. , 2007, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.
[11] J. Richter,et al. ACG Practice Guidelines: Esophageal Reflux Testing , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
[12] J. Johansson,et al. Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring Is Better Tolerated than the Catheter-Based Technique: Results from a Randomized Cross-Over Trial , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
[13] D. Castell,et al. Comparison Between the Combined Analysis and the DeMeester Score to Predict Response to PPI Therapy , 2006, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.
[14] A. Bredenoord,et al. Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring , 2005, Gut.
[15] W. Wong,et al. Is proton pump inhibitor testing an effective approach to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with noncardiac chest pain?: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.
[16] J. Wilson,et al. Functional esophageal disorders , 1999, Gut.
[17] V. Eckardt,et al. The impact of open access 24-h pH-metry on the diagnosis and management of esophageal reflux disease , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.
[18] J. Richter,et al. Reproducibility of proximal probe pH parameters in 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.
[19] T R DeMeester,et al. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. , 1992, The American journal of gastroenterology.
[20] 최명규,et al. The Performance and Safety of Bravo Esophageal pH Monitoring in Korean Patients , 2007 .
[21] W. Wong,et al. Is Proton Pump Inhibitor Testing an Effective Approach to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Noncardiac Chest Pain , 2005 .
[22] M. Pfister,et al. Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.