SEA ¿ Enhancing communication for better environmental decisions

Abstract Over the years SEA has been subjected to several interpretations, often resulting from different views on democratic processes and social considerations in decision-making. More than strictly a technical tool, as in its original form, SEA has the potential to act as a mediating instrument, bridging problem perceptions with technical solutions, steering the assessment to facilitate the integration of environmental values into decision-making processes, influencing decision-makers' capacity of acceptance. This paper explores the potential of SEA to enhance communication between different stakeholders, enabling discussion and agreement independently of different beliefs, convictions, social roles, values, accumulated experiences, individual needs, or any other factors, that express different world visions and determine the context within which decisions are taken. To face up to this challenge the authors suggest the establishment of communication strategies that enhance the role of SEA in the construction of social expectations and platforms of discussion, in the multiple negotiation processes that take place between stakeholders and decision-makers.

[1]  G. Atwood,et al.  The intersubjective perspective. , 1996, Psychoanalytic review.

[2]  W. Thissen,et al.  Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Riki Therivel,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action , 2004 .

[4]  Mellers Judgement and decision making , 1998 .

[5]  Suzan Dagg,et al.  SEA and integration of the environment into strategic decision-making , 2001 .

[6]  Roderic A. Gill,et al.  Planning for sustainability as a learning concept , 1998 .

[7]  Olivia Bina,et al.  Re-conceptualising strategic environmental assessment: theoretical overview and case study from Chile , 2004 .

[8]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Action science and organizational learning , 1995 .

[9]  Ken Sexton,et al.  Better Environmental Decisions Strategies for Governments, Businesses, and Communities , 2000 .

[10]  Judith Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment , 1999 .

[11]  J. Dijck After the two cultures: Towards a (multi)cultural practice of science communication , 2003 .

[12]  D. B. Dalal-Clayton,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience , 2005 .

[13]  Nancy Coppola,et al.  Technical communication, deliberative rhetoric, and environmental discourse : connections and directions , 2000 .

[14]  W. Sheate,et al.  Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA , 2003 .

[15]  Holger Dalkmann,et al.  DECISION MAKING AND STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT , 2001 .

[16]  Craig Waddell Defining sustainable development: A case study in environmental communication , 1995 .

[17]  M. E. Gonçalves Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal , 2002 .