Motor Unit Action Potential Duration, II: A New Automatic Measurement Method Based on the Wavelet Transform

The aim of this work is to present and evaluate a new algorithm, based on the wavelet transform, for the automatic measurement of motor unit action potential (MUAP) duration. A total of 240 MUAPs were studied. The waveform of each MUAP was wavelet-transformed, and the start and end points were estimated by regarding the maxima and minima points in a particular scale of the wavelet transform. The results of the new method were compared to the gold standard of duration marker positions obtained by manual measurement. The new method was also compared to a conventional algorithm, which we had found to be best in a previous comparative study. To evaluate the new method against manual measurements, the dispersion of automatic and manual duration markers were analyzed in a set of 19 repeatedly recorded MUAPs. The differences between the new algorithm’s marker positions and the gold standard of duration marker positions were smaller than those observed with the conventional method. The dispersion of the new algorithm’s marker positions was slightly less than that of the manual one. Our new method for automatic measurement of MUAP duration is more accurate than other available algorithms and more consistent than manual measurements.

[1]  G. Bellala.  Characterization of Signals from Multi scale Edges , 2009 .

[2]  Y. Meyer,et al.  Wavelets and Filter Banks , 1991 .

[3]  Fred Spiring,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  D Dumitru,et al.  Motor unit action potential duration and muscle length , 1999, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  C. Li,et al.  Detection of ECG characteristic points using wavelet transforms. , 1995, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[6]  Javier Navallas-Irujo,et al.  Filter design for cancellation of baseline-fluctuation in needle EMG recordings , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Evaluation of an automatic method of measuring features of motor unit action potentials , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  Masahiro Sonoo,et al.  New attempts to quantify concentric needle electromyography , 2002, Muscle & nerve. Supplement.

[9]  A. Geva,et al.  Forecasting generalized epileptic seizures from the EEG signal by wavelet analysis and dynamic unsupervised fuzzy clustering , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  A. Al-Fahoum,et al.  Combined wavelet transformation and radial basis neural networks for classifying life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  A. Labarga,et al.  Gamma band activity in an auditory oddball paradigm studied with the wavelet transform , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Erik Stålberg,et al.  Multi-MUP EMG analysis - a two year experience with a quantitative method in daily routine. , 1995 .

[13]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[14]  M. Zwarts,et al.  Determinants of motor unit action potential duration , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Roger M. Sauter,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[16]  E Stålberg,et al.  Quantitative motor unit potential analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[17]  E Stålberg,et al.  Reference values of motor unit action potentials obtained with multi‐MUAP analysis , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  I Takehara,et al.  Motor unit action potential (MUAP) parameters affected by editing duration cursors. , 2004, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Fang,et al.  Decomposition of multiunit electromyographic signals , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[21]  Metin Akay,et al.  Detection and Estimation Methods for Biomedical Signals , 1996 .

[22]  S. Devasahayam,et al.  Wavelet decomposition of the blink reflex R2 component enables improved discrimination of multiple sclerosis , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.