Microsoft Academic Automatic Document Searches: Accuracy for Journal Articles and Suitability for Citation Analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century , 2012 .
[2] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Do Scopus and WoS correct “old” omitted citations? , 2016, Scientometrics.
[3] Bartosz Paszcza,et al. Comparison of Microsoft Academic (Graph) with Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2016 .
[4] Mike Thelwall,et al. Does Microsoft Academic find early citations? , 2017, Scientometrics.
[5] Satu Alakangas,et al. Microsoft Academic is one year old: the Phoenix is ready to leave the nest , 2017, Scientometrics.
[6] Mike Thelwall,et al. Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[7] Mike Thelwall,et al. The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management , 2015 .
[8] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. A novel approach for estimating the omitted-citation rate of bibliometric databases with an application to the field of bibliometrics , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases , 2015, Scientometrics.
[10] Martin P. Brändle,et al. Citation analysis with microsoft academic , 2016, Scientometrics.
[11] Alan L. Mackay,et al. Publish or perish , 1974, Nature.
[12] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. Microsoft Academic (Search): a Phoenix arisen from the ashes? , 2016, Scientometrics.
[13] Mike Thelwall,et al. Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation , 2016, J. Informetrics.
[14] Mike Thelwall,et al. Evaluating altmetrics , 2013, Scientometrics.
[15] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science , 2016, J. Informetrics.
[16] MongeonPhilippe,et al. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus , 2016 .
[17] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Influence of omitted citations on the bibliometric statistics of the major Manufacturing journals , 2015, Scientometrics.
[18] Mike Thelwall,et al. Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators , 2016, Scientometrics.
[19] Petr Knoth,et al. An Analysis of the Microsoft Academic Graph , 2016, D Lib Mag..
[20] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[21] Mike Thelwall,et al. Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.
[22] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. Scientific journal publishers and omitted citations in bibliometric databases: Any relationship? , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[23] Yang Song,et al. An Overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and Applications , 2015, WWW.
[24] Henk F. Moed,et al. Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the Literature , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[25] Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al. The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus , 2016, J. Informetrics.
[26] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Adèle Paul-Hus,et al. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.
[28] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[29] Satu Alakangas,et al. Microsoft Academic: is the phoenix getting wings? , 2016, Scientometrics.
[30] Lutz Bornmann,et al. The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science , 2017, Scientometrics.
[31] Mike Thelwall,et al. Microsoft Academic: A multidisciplinary comparison of citation counts with Scopus and Mendeley for 29 journals , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[32] Martin P. Brändle,et al. The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university , 2017, Scientometrics.
[33] Michel Zitt,et al. The journal impact factor: angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay’s article 2011 , 2012, Scientometrics.