Obtaining Informationally Consistent Decisions When Computing Costs with Limited Information

We demonstrate the need to view in a dynamic context any decision based on limited information. We focus on the use of product costs in selecting the product portfolio. We show how ex post data regarding the actual costs from implementing the decision leads to updating of product cost estimates and potentially trigger a revision of the initial decision. We model this updating process as a discrete dynamical system (DDS). We define a decision as informationally consistent if it is a fixed-point solution to the DDS. We employ numerical analysis to characterize the existence and properties of such solutions. We find that fixed points are rare, but that simple heuristics find them often and quickly. We demonstrate the usefulness and robustness of our methodology by examining the interaction of limited information with multiple decision rules (heuristics) and problem features (size of product portfolio, profitability of product markets). We discuss implications for research on cost systems.

[1]  Jing Wang,et al.  Exploring the oscillatory dynamics of a forbidden returns inventory system , 2014 .

[2]  M. Petkovšek Finding closed-form solutions of difference equations by symbolic methods , 1991 .

[3]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Activity-based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage , 1992 .

[4]  Maris Goldmanis,et al.  Efficient Cost Allocation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Bala V. Balachandran,et al.  On the Efficiency of Cost-based Decision Rules for Capacity Planning , 1995 .

[6]  Annett Wechsler Population Biology Concepts And Models , 2016 .

[7]  K. Sivaramakrishnan,et al.  A Critical Overview of the Use of Full‐Cost Data for Planning and Pricing , 2002 .

[8]  西山 茂 戦略管理会計 = Managerial accounting , 2009 .

[9]  John H. Evans,et al.  Product cost bias and selection of an allocation base , 1993 .

[10]  F. Brauer,et al.  Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology , 2001 .

[11]  Mario Vanhoucke,et al.  A simulation analysis of interactions among errors in costing system design , 2007 .

[12]  Ward Hanson,et al.  The dynamics of cost‐plus pricing , 1992 .

[13]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Dynamical Systems , 1999 .

[14]  Robert W. Easton,et al.  Geometric methods for discrete dynamical systems , 1998 .

[15]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Periodic Orbit Continuation in Multiple Time Scale Systems , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Coordinating lead times and safety stocks under autocorrelated demand , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Mario Vanhoucke,et al.  A Simulation Analysis of Interactions Among Errors in Costing Systems , 2007 .

[18]  Karel J. Keesman,et al.  System Identification: An Introduction , 2011 .

[19]  Stephen Hansen,et al.  Evaluating Heuristics Used When Designing Product Costing Systems , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  Aggregation, Specification and Measurement Errors in Product Costing , 1994 .

[21]  Shaler Stidham,et al.  Stability and Chaos in Input Pricing for a Service Facility with Adaptive Customer Response to Congestion , 1998 .

[22]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[23]  B. Kitchens Symbolic Dynamics: One-sided, Two-sided and Countable State Markov Shifts , 1997 .