Runoff and sediment losses from rough and smooth soil surfaces in a laboratory experiment

Soil surface roughness may significantly impact runoff and erosion under rainfall. A common perception is that runoff and erosion are decreased as a function of roughness because of surface ponding and increased hydraulic roughness that reduces effective flow shear stress. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of initial surface roughness on runoff and erosion under controlled laboratory conditions. Initially, rough and smooth surfaces were exposed to five simulated rainfall applications at 5% and 20% slopes. In all cases, runoff was delayed for the case of the initially rough surface; however, this effect was temporary. Overall, no statistical differences in either total runoff or erosion were measured on the 20% slope. At 5% slope, runoff was less on the rough surface for the first rainfall application but greater on the final three, probably due to the formation of a depositional seal in that case. This resulted in an overall insignificant difference in runoff for the sum of the five rainfall applications. Erosion was greater on the rougher slope at 5% steepness, probably due to concentration of flow as it moved around the roughness elements on the rougher slope. These results indicate that commonly held perceptions of the impact of soil surface roughness on runoff and erosion may not be entirely correct in all cases. D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Determining the mean depth of overland flow in field studies of flow hydraulics , 1990 .

[2]  Y. Bissonnais,et al.  The implications of spatial variability in surface seal hydraulic resistance for infiltration in a mound and depression microtopography , 1998 .

[3]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[4]  M. Singer,et al.  Crust formation effects on soil erosion processes. , 1990 .

[5]  William J. Elliot,et al.  WEPP-Predicting water erosion using a process-based model , 1997 .

[6]  Peter B. Hairsine,et al.  Modeling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles: 1. Sheet flow , 1992 .

[7]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Surface Roughness Related Processes of Runoff and Soil Loss: A Flume Study , 1998 .

[8]  M. J. Romkens,et al.  Effect of Tillage on Surface Roughness , 1986 .

[9]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Are River Basins Optimal Channel Networks , 1993 .

[10]  M. Nearing,et al.  Development and evolution of rill networks under simulated rainfall , 2003 .

[11]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[12]  Hans A. Einstein,et al.  River Channel Roughness , 1952 .

[13]  W. D. Kemper,et al.  Interdependence of Water Drop Energy and Clod Size on Infiltration and Clod Stability1 , 1969 .

[14]  W. Tharp,et al.  Soil Survey of Tippecanoe County, Indiana , 1912 .

[15]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to Overland Flow on Desert Pavement and Its Implications for Sediment Transport Modeling , 1991 .

[16]  Walter G. Lovely,et al.  The Analysis of Soil Surface Roughness , 1970 .

[17]  Chi-Hua Huang,et al.  An Instantaneous‐Profile Laser Scanner to Measure Soil Surface Microtopography , 2003 .

[18]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes , 2002 .

[19]  C. A. Onstad,et al.  Depressional Storage on Tilled Soil Surfaces , 1984 .

[20]  C. A. Onstad,et al.  Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness: A review , 1987 .