A Channel Network Model as a Framework for Characterizing Variably Saturated Flow in Biofilm‐Affected Soils

Understanding and predicting the hydraulic properties of biofilm-affected porous media is of high importance in bioremediation, filtration, and bioreactors. In this study, a channel network model was applied for characterizing the variably saturated flow in biofilm-affected soils. The soil pores are represented by a network of interconnected channels having a triangular cross-section in which the shape of the water surface is determined by the matric head. The channel network model provides a better representation of the pore space than the capillary bundle model by accounting for pore connectivity and allowing for dual occupancy at individual pores. The effect of the biofilm on the network hydraulic properties was analyzed by considering three synthetic scenarios for the biofilm spatial distribution. The first scenario assumed that the biofilms fully clogged the smallest pores; the second scenario assumed that the biofilm covered all pore walls in a layer of uniform thickness; and the third scenario assumed that the biofilm covered a uniform fraction of the pore cross-sectional area. We showed that the biofilm spatial distribution has a significant effect on the flow and hydraulic properties. Moreover, pore connectivity plays a significant role when considering flow in biofilm-affected soils and therefore must be taken into account. Finally, the simulations demonstrated that the effect of biofilms on the hydraulic properties of the network is a complicated and nonlinear function that depends not only on the biofilm scenario but also on the saturation.

[1]  M. Blunt Flow in porous media — pore-network models and multiphase flow , 2001 .

[2]  Shmulik P. Friedman,et al.  Physical constraints affecting bacterial habitats and activity in unsaturated porous media – a review , 2007 .

[3]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  The Influence of Biofilm Spatial Distribution Scenarios on Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils , 2009 .

[4]  D. Or,et al.  Extracellular Polymeric Substances Affecting Pore‐Scale Hydrologic Conditions for Bacterial Activity in Unsaturated Soils , 2007 .

[5]  W. O. Robinson THE OCCURRENCE OF RARE EARTHS IN PLANTS AND SOILS , 1943 .

[6]  Stewart W. Taylor,et al.  Biofilm growth and the related changes in the physical properties of a porous medium: 2. Permeability , 1990 .

[7]  Pierre Régnier,et al.  A reactive transport modeling approach to simulate biogeochemical processes in pore structures with pore-scale heterogeneities , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Modeling of a microbial growth experiment with bioclogging in a two-dimensional saturated porous media flow field. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[9]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[10]  Dani Or,et al.  Microbial growth on partially saturated rough surfaces: Simulations in idealized roughness networks , 2007 .

[11]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Percolation Theory and Network Modeling Applications in Soil Physics , 1998 .

[12]  T. P. Clement,et al.  Macroscopic Models for Predicting Changes in Saturated Porous Media Properties Caused by Microbial Growth , 1996 .

[13]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Water Retention Curves of Biofilm-Affected Soils using Xanthan as an Analogue , 2012 .

[14]  I. Gates,et al.  Pore‐network modeling of biofilm evolution in porous media , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Environmental impact and mechanisms of the biological clogging of saturated soils and aquifer materials , 1998 .

[16]  Peter Blaser,et al.  Preferential Flow Paths: Biological Hot Spots in Soils , 2001 .

[17]  Bacterial clogging of porous media: a new modelling approach , 1995 .

[18]  J. Crawford,et al.  Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[19]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Interaction between water flow and spatial distribution of microbial growth in a two-dimensional flow field in saturated porous media. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[20]  J. Matsumoto,et al.  Effect of infiltration rate on biological clogging and water quality changes during artificial recharge , 1979 .

[21]  Clayton J. Radke,et al.  Laminar flow of a wetting liquid along the corners of a predominantly gas-occupied noncircular pore , 1988 .

[22]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[23]  S. M. Hassanizadeh,et al.  A new formulation for pore‐network modeling of two‐phase flow , 2012 .

[24]  Myron B. Allen,et al.  Macroscale Properties of Porous Media from a Network Model of Biofilm Processes , 1998 .

[25]  Matthew D. Jackson,et al.  Detailed physics, predictive capabilities and macroscopic consequences for pore-network models of multiphase flow. , 2002 .

[26]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Influence of Microbial Growth on Hydraulic Properties of Pore Networks , 2002, Groundwater 2000.

[27]  Martin Thullner,et al.  Comparison of bioclogging effects in saturated porous media within one- and two-dimensional flow systems , 2010 .

[28]  C. Laroche,et al.  Two-Phase Flow Properties Prediction from Small-Scale Data Using Pore-Network Modeling , 2005 .

[29]  P. V. Van Geel,et al.  Validation of a Relative Permeability Model for Bioclogging in Unsaturated Soils , 2012 .

[30]  John S. Selker,et al.  Impact of microbial growth on water flow and solute transport in unsaturated porous media , 2006 .

[31]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Reduction Caused by Aerobic Bacteria in Sand Columns , 1992 .

[32]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Simulations of two‐dimensional modeling of biomass aggregate growth in network models , 2001 .

[33]  D. Or,et al.  Flow in unsaturated fractured porous media: Hydraulic conductivity of rough surfaces , 2000 .

[34]  Brian J. Suchomel,et al.  Network Model of Flow, Transport and Biofilm Effects in Porous Media , 1998 .

[35]  D. Or,et al.  Aqueous films limit bacterial cell motility and colony expansion on partially saturated rough surfaces. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[36]  Tadeusz W Patzek,et al.  Verification of a Complete Pore Network Simulator of Drainage and Imbibition , 2001 .

[37]  Philippe Baveye,et al.  Computational pore network modeling of the influence of biofilm permeability on bioclogging in porous media , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[39]  L. Ranjard,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative microscale distribution of bacteria in soil. , 2001, Research in microbiology.

[40]  G. R. Jerauld,et al.  The effect of pore-structure on hysteresis in relative permeability and capillary pressure: Pore-level modeling , 1990 .

[41]  P. V. Van Geel,et al.  Conceptual Models and Simulations for Biological Clogging in Unsaturated Soils , 2007 .

[42]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Microbial Clogging of Saturated Soils and Aquifer Materials: Evaluation of Mathematical Models , 1995 .