Politeness Counts: Perceptions of Peacekeeping Robots

The “intuitive” trust people feel when encountering robots in public spaces is a key determinant of their willingness to cooperate with these robots. We conducted four experiments to study this topic in the context of peacekeeping robots. Participants viewed scenarios, presented as static images or animations, involving a robot or a human guard performing an access-control task. The guards interacted more or less politely with younger and older male and female people. Our results show strong effects of the guard's politeness. The age and sex of the people interacting with the guard had no significant effect on participants' impressions of its attributes. There were no differences between responses to robot and human guards. This study advances the notion that politeness is a crucial determinant of people's perception of peacekeeping robots.

[1]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Effects of Warning Validity and Proximity on Responses to Warnings , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[4]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Ohad Inbar,et al.  Lowering the line of visibility: incidental users in service encounters , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[6]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .

[7]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[8]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture part I: Motivation and philosophy , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  S. L. See,et al.  Applying politeness maxims in social robotics polite dialogue , 2012, HRI 2012.

[10]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Determinants of system transparency and its influence on trust in and reliance on unmanned robotic systems , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[11]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Etiquette equality: exhibitions and expectations of computer politeness , 2004, CACM.

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Rosemarie E. Yagoda,et al.  You Want Me to Trust a ROBOT? The Development of a Human–Robot Interaction Trust Scale , 2012, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[14]  Patrick Lin,et al.  Autonomous Military Robotics: Risk, Ethics, and Design , 2008 .

[15]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Can You Trust Your Robot? , 2011 .

[16]  Andreas Theodorou,et al.  Robot transparency, trust and utility , 2016, Connect. Sci..

[17]  B. S. Fuller,et al.  Reversal of the Cry-Wolf Effect: An Investigation of Two Methods to Increase Alarm Response Rates , 1995 .

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[19]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Manners Matter , 2015 .

[20]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust , 1998 .

[22]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Creating Trustworthy Robots: Lessons and Inspirations from Automated Systems , 2009 .

[23]  Mohamed Chetouani,et al.  Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Saad Khan,et al.  Towards Improving Human-Robot Interaction For Social Robots , 2015 .

[25]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[26]  S. Blum-Kulka.  Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? , 1987 .

[27]  A. Dorn,et al.  Smart Peacekeeping: Toward Tech-Enabled UN Operations , 2016 .

[28]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Common metrics for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[31]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[32]  Peggy Wu,et al.  A Computational Approach to Etiquette: Operationalizing Brown and Levinson's Politeness Model , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[33]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  Trust in Adaptive Automation : The Role of Etiquette in Tuning Trust via Analogic and Affective Methods , 2005 .

[34]  A Persson,et al.  Passive versus active operator work in automated process control--a job design case study in a control centre. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[35]  Samuel S. Monfort,et al.  Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[36]  Ewart J. de Visser,et al.  Politeness in Machine-Human and Human-Human Interaction , 2016 .

[37]  E. Goffman.  Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[38]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems , 2004, CACM.

[39]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Affective social robots , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[40]  Ladislau Bölöni,et al.  Modeling the Interaction Between Mixed Teams of Humans and Robots and Local Population for a Market Patrol Task , 2012, FLAIRS Conference.

[41]  Ladislau Bölöni,et al.  Emulating the Consistency of Human Behavior with an Autonomous Robot in a Market Scenario , 2013, AAAI Workshop: Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition.

[42]  S. Breckler.  Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[44]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  - Human–Computer Etiquette: Should Computers Be Polite? , 2010 .

[45]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[47]  Jie Xu,et al.  Understanding active and passive users: the effects of an active user using normal, hard and unreliable technologies on user assessment of trust in technology and co-user. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.