A New Tool for Digital Alignment in Virtual Anthropology

The study of the fossil record is fundamental to understand the evolution of traits. Because fossil remains are often fragmented and/or deformed by taphonomic processes, a preliminary realignment of their constituent parts is often necessary to properly interpret their shapes. In virtual anthropology, these procedures are carried out using digital models of the remains. We present a new semi‐automatic alignment R software, Digital Tool for Alignment (DTA), which uses the shape information contained in a reference sample to find the best alignment solution for the disarticulated regions. We tested DTA on three different case‐studies: (1) a sample of 14 primate species including both male and female individuals, (2) a simulated, disarticulated skull of Homo sapiens, and (3) a real disarticulated human fossil specimen, Amud 1 (Homo neanderthalensis). In the first case study, we simulated disarticulation directly on digital models of the primate skulls and tested alignment quality as a function of phylogenetic proximity, sex, and body size. In the second, we compared DTA to manual alignments conducted for the same digital models. Finally, we performed DTA on a real‐world case study. We found that phylogenetic proximity provides is the most important factor for alignment efficiency. However, sex and allometric effects might also be important and should therefore be taken into account at selecting reference models for alignments. DTA performs at least as well as manual alignments. Yet, as compared to manual procedures, it is faster, requires no prior anatomical knowledge and expertise and allows indefinite manipulation of the fossil items. Anat Rec, 302:1104–1115, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  A. Rosas,et al.  A hominid from the lower Pleistocene of Atapuerca, Spain: possible ancestor to Neandertals and modern humans. , 1997, Science.

[2]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Virtual cranial reconstruction of Sahelanthropus tchadensis , 2005, Nature.

[3]  W. Howells,et al.  Les hommes fossiles de La Ferrassie, Vol. 1. Le Giesement. Les squelettes adultes (crâne et squelette du tronc). By Jean‐Louis Heim. Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Mem. 35. Masson, Paris. 1976. $52.00 (paper). 31 pp., figures, tables , 1978 .

[4]  Raquel Moya-Costa,et al.  Protocol for the reconstruction of micromammals from fossils. Two case studies: The skulls of Beremendia fissidens and Dolinasorex glyphodon , 2019, PloS one.

[5]  S. Schlager,et al.  Retrodeformation of fossil specimens based on 3D bilateral semi-landmarks: Implementation in the R package “Morpho” , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  L. Leakey A New Fossil Skull From Olduvai , 1959, Nature.

[7]  Gerhard W Weber,et al.  Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[8]  C. Zollikofer,et al.  New evidence from Le Moustier 1: Computer‐assisted reconstruction and morphometry of the skull , 1999, The Anatomical record.

[9]  Stefano Benazzi,et al.  Technical note: virtual reconstruction of KNM-ER 1813 Homo habilis cranium. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  Nina Amenta,et al.  Evaluation of a New Method of Fossil Retrodeformation by Algorithmic Symmetrization: Crania of Papionins (Primates, Cercopithecidae) as a Test Case , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  G. Manzi,et al.  The evolution of cranial base and face in Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea: Modularity and morphological integration , 2017, American journal of primatology.

[12]  Lashi Bandara,et al.  ShapeRotator: an R tool for standardised rigid rotations of articulated Three-Dimensional structures with application for geometric morphometrics , 2017 .

[13]  B. Latimer,et al.  Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia. , 1999, Science.

[14]  D. Weaver The Shanidar Neandertals , 1988 .

[15]  M. P. D. León Computerized paleoanthropology and Neanderthals: The case of Le Moustier 1 , 2003 .

[16]  Luca Fiorenza,et al.  Cranial shape variation in adult howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) , 2018, American journal of primatology.

[17]  Luke J. Matthews,et al.  The 10kTrees website: A new online resource for primate phylogeny , 2010 .

[18]  L. Bellucci,et al.  Virtual Anthropology and its Application in Cultural Heritage Studies , 2018, Studies in Conservation.

[19]  A new OH5 reconstruction with an assessment of its uncertainty. , 2011, Journal of human evolution.

[20]  鈴木 尚,et al.  The Amud man and his cave site , 1970 .

[21]  B. Shea On aspects of skull form in African apes and orangutans, with implications for hominoid evolution. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  J. Biegert The Evaluation of Characteristics of the Skull, Hands, and Feet for Primate Taxonomy , 2017 .

[23]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  A New Fully Automated Approach for Aligning and Comparing Shapes , 2015, Anatomical record.

[24]  N. Ogihara,et al.  Computerized restoration of nonhomogeneous deformation of a fossil cranium based on bilateral symmetry. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  P. Jell,et al.  A statistical/computer-graphic technique for assessing variation in tectonically deformed fossils and its application to Cambrian trilobites from Kashmir , 1992 .

[26]  T. M. Brown Life history of a fossil: An introduction to taphonomy and paleoecology , 1983 .

[27]  Y. Rak,et al.  The skull of Australopithecus afarensis , 2005 .

[28]  Naomichi Ogihara,et al.  Virtual reconstruction of the Neanderthal Amud 1 cranium. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  Caleb M. Brown,et al.  Incomplete specimens in geometric morphometric analyses , 2014 .

[30]  P. Currie,et al.  Analyzing Taphonomic Deformation of Ankylosaur Skulls Using Retrodeformation and Finite Element Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  S. Schlager,et al.  Digital reconstruction of the Ceprano calvarium (Italy), and implications for its interpretation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[32]  P. Gunz,et al.  A uniquely modern human pattern of endocranial development. Insights from a new cranial reconstruction of the Neandertal newborn from Mezmaiskaya. , 2012, Journal of human evolution.

[33]  J. L. Thompson,et al.  A new reconstruction of the Le Moustier 1 skull and investigation of internal structures using 3-D-muCT data. , 1998, Journal of human evolution.

[34]  Phil Culverhouse,et al.  Time to automate identification , 2010, Nature.