Effect of the Location of the Detonation Initiation Point for Bench Blasting

Uneven floor and fragmentation play an important role in blasting operations due to the direct effects on the efficiency of hauling and loading. This paper focuses on the influences of initiation position on bench blasting in order to improve blasting effects. The numerical simulations of bench blasting at different initiation points (top, middle, and bottom) are implemented based on secondary development of LS-DYNA with a tensile-compressive damage model. The damage spatial distribution characteristics of different initiation points are compared. The outlines of rock foundation and boulder areas are analyzed with the damage threshold of critical breakage that is ascertained by acoustic characteristic of damage rock mass. Results of the numerical simulations demonstrate that different initiation points make a great influence on the stress and energy distribution in blasting process and induce different blasting effects. Middle initiation turns out to be the best initiation to increase the flatness of the floor and decrease the oversize boulder ratio simultaneously, which will increase the damage areas of the bottom and top regions and give a better blasting effect. Field experiment in Baihetan Station was carried out to validate conclusions of numerical simulation. Research could provide a good reference for the improvement of rock blasting.

[1]  Peng Yan,et al.  Spatial distribution of excavation induced damage zone of high rock slope , 2013 .

[2]  Jae-Joon Song,et al.  Optimized blasting design for large-scale quarrying based on a 3-D spatial distribution of rock factor , 2009 .

[3]  W. F. Bawden,et al.  A new constitutive model for blast damage , 1996 .

[4]  P. D. Katsabanis,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A CONTINUUM DAMAGE MODEL FOR BLASTING ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[5]  Zheming Zhu,et al.  Numerical prediction of crater blasting and bench blasting , 2009 .

[6]  L. M. Taylor,et al.  Microcrack-induced damage accumulation in brittle rock under dynamic loading , 1986 .

[7]  Jean du Mouza,et al.  A methodology for rock mass characterisation and classification to improve blast results , 2005 .

[8]  M. E. Kipp,et al.  Continuum modelling of explosive fracture in oil shale , 1980 .

[9]  M Taji,et al.  ODM: a new approach for open pit mine blasting evaluation , 2013 .

[10]  S. K Mandal,et al.  Mechanics of rock breakage by blasting and its application in blasting design , 2007 .

[11]  A. Jones 10 – Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering , 1989 .

[12]  Y Long,et al.  Influence of initiation point position on fragmentation by blasting in iron ore , 2012 .

[13]  R. D. Ambrosini,et al.  Size of craters produced by explosive charges on or above the ground surface , 2002 .

[14]  Peng Yan,et al.  Comparison of Blast-Induced Damage Between Presplit and Smooth Blasting of High Rock Slope , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[15]  Martin Sichel A simple analysis of the blast initiation of detonations , 1977 .

[16]  J. A. Nicholls,et al.  Blast Initiation and Propagation of Cylindrical Detonations in MAPP-Air Mixtures , 1974 .

[17]  N. Jiang,et al.  Damage Characteristics of Surrounding Rock Subjected to VCR Mining Blasting Shock , 2015 .

[18]  Heping Xie,et al.  Numerical investigation of blasting-induced damage in cylindrical rocks , 2008 .

[19]  Vinay Kumar Singh,et al.  Causes of toe formation at dragline bench and its remedial measures , 2012 .

[20]  S. S. Kanchibotla,et al.  Optimum Blasting? Is it Minimum Cost Per Broken Rock or Maximum Value Per Broken Rock? , 2003 .