Surface electromyographic signals using a dry electrode

A new flexible, dry electrode is examined for recording surface electromyographic signals and compared to a conventional Ag/AgCl electrode. A suitable dry electrode would enable practical implementation of wearable mobility monitoring systems. Results from a preliminary experiment are presented in this paper. Measurements were performed on the right tibialis anterior during a series of small and large contractions. The effects of skin preparation, which included shaving and cleaning with isopropyl alcohol, are also examined. Results show that the dry electrode is sensitive enough to detect the small, unloaded muscle contractions. The dry electrode signal strength was similar to the Ag/AgCl electrode; however, the noise level was higher by approximately 13.5±1.3 %. Skin preparation reduced the noise level by approximately 7.9% for the dry electrodes and 8.1% for the Ag/AgCl electrodes.

[1]  A. Chan,et al.  Surface Electromyographic Signals Using Dry Electrodes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  L. Geddes,et al.  Temporal changes in electrode impedance while recording the electrocardiogram with “Dry” electrodes , 1973, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Simon Ferguson,et al.  Grasp Recognition From Myoelectric Signals , 2002 .

[4]  A. Kargov,et al.  Comparison of surface EMG monitoring electrodes for long-term use in rehabilitation device control , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[5]  L. Kirkup,et al.  A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[7]  J.-N. Helal,et al.  The spatial integration effect of surface electrode detecting myoelectric signal , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Ramon Pallàs-Areny,et al.  A comprehensive model for power line interference in biopotential measurements , 2000, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[10]  O. Such,et al.  Dry electrodes for monitoring of vital signs in functional textiles , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Flexible dry electrode for recording surface electromyogram , 2010, 2010 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[12]  K.-P. Hoffmann,et al.  Flexible dry surface-electrodes for ECG long-term monitoring , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  K. Park,et al.  Flexible polymeric dry electrodes for the long-term monitoring of ECG , 2008 .

[14]  Werner Wolf,et al.  Onset Detection in Surface Electromyographic Signals: A Systematic Comparison of Methods , 2001, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[15]  D. Goodin,et al.  Ovid: Pullman: Neurology, Volume 55(2).July 25, 2000.171-177 , 2006 .

[16]  J. Potvin.  Effects of muscle kinematics on surface EMG amplitude and frequency during fatiguing dynamic contractions. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  J. Webster.  Reducing Motion Artifacts and Interference in Biopotential Recording , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  S. Micera,et al.  Characterization of a New Type of Dry Electrodes for Long-Term Recordings of Surface-Electromyogram , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[19]  J. Webster,et al.  Minimizing Electrode Motion Artifact by Skin Abrasion , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.