Quantitative Multiplex Methylation-Specific PCR Analysis Doubles Detection of Tumor Cells in Breast Ductal Fluid

Purpose: The challenges of cytology for accurate diagnosis of breast cancer are well recognized. We previously showed that normal and tumor tissue can be distinguished using a technique called quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP). We hypothesized that quantitative analysis of methylated genes will provide enhanced detection of cancer cells present in cytologic specimens. Experimental Design: QM-MSP was done on ductal lavage cells from a set of 37 ductal lavage samples from women undergoing mastectomy (27 with cancer and 3 without). Duct histology information was available for each lavaged duct. QM-MSP data was assessed by measuring cumulative methylation index and by receiver operating characteristic threshold analysis. To determine the baseline level of methylation for each gene in this population, cells from 60 ducts of women at high risk of developing breast cancer were analyzed. Results: QM-MSP findings on a panel of nine genes were correlated to duct histology and ductal lavage cytology. Cytology detected cancer in 33% (7 of 21 ducts) with a specificity of 99% (92 of 93). QM-MSP detected cancer as calculated by cumulative methylation index with a sensitivity of 62% (13 of 21) and specificity of 82% (62 of 76) and by receiver operating characteristic threshold analysis with a sensitivity of 71% (15 of 21) and specificity of 83% (63 of 76). Conclusions: Compared with cytology, QM-MSP doubled the sensitivity of detection of cancer. This study provides proof of principle by showing the advantages of using methylation analyses to query cytologic specimens and indicates its potential use in diagnosis and in stratifying risk.

[1]  O. Olopade,et al.  BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer is associated with reduced BRCA1 copy number and chromosome 17 aneusomy. , 2005, Cancer research.

[2]  M. Mayo,et al.  Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention. , 2005, Endocrine-related cancer.

[3]  S. Plevritis,et al.  Ductal Lavage of Fluid-Yielding and Non–Fluid-Yielding Ducts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers and Other Women at High Inherited Breast Cancer Risk , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  Ana Osorio,et al.  A predictor based on the somatic genomic changes of the BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer tumors identifies the non-BRCA1/BRCA2 tumors with BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[5]  S. Husain,et al.  CpG methylation of the FHIT, FANCF, cyclin-D2, BRCA2 and RUNX3 genes in Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of ovarian origin , 2004, Molecular Cancer.

[6]  B. Ljung,et al.  Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  B. MacGibbon,et al.  Ductoscopic cytology and image analysis to detect breast carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[8]  Pedram Argani,et al.  Quantitative Multiplex Methylation-Specific PCR Assay for the Detection of Promoter Hypermethylation in Multiple Genes in Breast Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[9]  Thea D. Tlsty,et al.  Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in Mammary Epithelial Cells May Mimic Early Events in Carcinogenesis , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[10]  S. Swain,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Prognostic molecular markers in early breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  Lajos Pusztai,et al.  Breast cancer biomarkers and molecular medicine: part II , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[13]  M. Fackler,et al.  DNA methylation of RASSF1A, HIN‐1, RAR‐β, Cyclin D2 and Twist in in situ and invasive lobular breast carcinoma , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[14]  Manel Esteller,et al.  Methylation of p16(INK4a) promoters occurs in vivo in histologically normal human mammary epithelia. , 2003, Cancer research.

[15]  Martin Widschwendter,et al.  DNA methylation and breast carcinogenesis , 2002, Oncogene.

[16]  M. Morrow,et al.  Ductal lavage and ductoscopy: the opportunities and the limitations. , 2002, Clinical breast cancer.

[17]  M. Stanley,et al.  Atypia in breast fine-needle aspiration smears correlates poorly with the presence of a prognostically significant proliferative lesion of ductal epithelium. , 1993, Human pathology.

[18]  J. Minna,et al.  Promoter hypermethylation in benign breast epithelium in relation to predicted breast cancer risk. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[19]  M. Fackler,et al.  Novel Agents for Chemoprevention, Screening Methods, and Sampling Issues , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.