Inventor's Knowledge Set as the Antecedent of Patent Importance

This paper investigates the antecedents of patent importance by looking at the prior knowledge set of academic inventors. Using independent methodologies, we distinguish between the scientific knowledge set and the technical knowledge set, and separate these from other kinds of prior expertise. We find that the patents of the inventors who have a prior scholarly knowledge of the topic are on average more important (more cited after 6 years). Conversely, we find an inverted U-shape relationship between prior technical relatedness and patent importance. These results are potentially useful to support the work of practitioners such as university technology managers, which often face difficulties in identifying the importance and perspective value of the disclosed inventions, amid high market and legal uncertainty and budget shortages.

[1]  Raffaele Conti,et al.  Learning to Be Edison: Inventors, Organizations, and Breakthrough Inventions , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[2]  The Economic Value of Patent Portfolios , 2013 .

[3]  José Lobo,et al.  Using patent technology codes to study technological change , 2012 .

[4]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting , 2011 .

[5]  Emanuele Bacchiocchi,et al.  International Knowledge Diffusion and Home-Bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story? , 2010 .

[6]  Devrim Göktepe-Hultén,et al.  Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation? , 2010 .

[7]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  The grace period in international patent law and its effect on the timing of disclosure , 2010 .

[8]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Specific and General Information Sharing Among Academic Scientists , 2009 .

[9]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer , 2009 .

[10]  Chiara Franzoni,et al.  Do scientists get fundamental research ideas by solving practical problems , 2009 .

[11]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  The Unequal Benefits of Academic Patenting for Science and Engineering Research , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on University Research and Its Transfer , 2009 .

[13]  F. Montobbio,et al.  International knowledge diffusion and home-bias effect , 2009 .

[14]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[15]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[16]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey , 2007 .

[17]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[18]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .

[19]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[20]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[21]  Chiara Franzoni.  Five case studies from UK and Italy , 2007 .

[22]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[23]  C. Franzoni.  Opportunity recognition in technology transfer organizations , 2006 .

[24]  Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al.  Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions , 2006 .

[25]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[26]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  View from the Bench: Patents and Material Transfers , 2005, Science.

[27]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[28]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[29]  Fiona E. Murray.  Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis* , 2005 .

[30]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Innovation and Incentives , 2004 .

[31]  R. Nelson.  The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[32]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[33]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  The Disclosure and Licensing of University Inventions , 2003 .

[34]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[35]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[36]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[37]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[38]  S. Shane.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[39]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[40]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[41]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[42]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[43]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[44]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[46]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information , 1990 .

[47]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[48]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[49]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[50]  Z. Griliches.  Market Value, R&D, and Patents , 1981 .