Safety and efficacy of the new bidirectional rotational Evolution® mechanical lead extraction sheath: results from a multicentre Italian registry

Aims The aim of this prospective multicentre study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of the new bidirectional rotational mechanical lead extraction (LE) sheath (Evolution RL, Cook Medical, USA) in chronically implanted leads (>1-year-old leads). Methods and results Between September 2013 and June 2016, a total of 238 leads in 124 consecutive patients were removed by using the new Evolution RL rotational mechanical sheath. Indications for LE were cardiac device infection in 63 (50.8%) cases, lead malfunction in 41 (33.1%), upgrade in 1 (0.8%) case and for other reasons in the remaining 19 cases (15.3%). Ninety-one leads (38.2%) were implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads (81 dual coil vs. 10 single coil), 38 (16%) right ventricular leads, 86 (36.1%) right atrial leads, and 23 (9.7%) coronary sinus leads. The mean implant duration was 92.2 ± 52.9 months (range 12-336). 91.6% of the leads (218/238) were extracted completely with the Evolution RL alone, with the complete success rate rising to 98.7% (235/238 leads) with combined use of a snare. Overall clinical success rate was 100%. No Evolution sheath-related complications were noted. There were no deaths or major complications. Five minor complications (4%) were encountered. In cases of companion leads no wrapping or lead damage were observed. Conclusion On the basis of our prospective multicentre study, the new hand-powered bidirectional rotational mechanical LE sheath is an effective and safe tool for the extraction of chronically implanted leads without major complications and lead wrapping or lead damage.

[1]  A. Elvan,et al.  Success and complication rates of lead extraction with the first- vs. the second-generation Evolution mechanical sheath , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Elvan,et al.  Lead extractions: the Zwolle experience with the Evolution mechanical sheath. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  C. Nazlı,et al.  Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[4]  V. Falk,et al.  Clinical performance of a new bidirectional rotational mechanical lead extraction sheath. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  M. Bongiorni,et al.  Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[6]  D. Tsiachris,et al.  Advanced techniques for chronic lead extraction: heading from the laser towards the evolution system. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  V. Falk,et al.  Transvenous lead extractions: comparison of laser vs. mechanical approach. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  D. Tsiachris,et al.  Predictors of Advanced Lead Extraction Based on a Systematic Stepwise Approach: Results from a High Volume Center , 2013, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  A. Oto,et al.  Evolution in Transvenous Extraction of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads Using a Mechanical Dilator Sheath , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  J. Deharo,et al.  Pathways for training and accreditation for transvenous lead extraction: a European Heart Rhythm Association position paper. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Oto,et al.  Percutaneous extraction of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads with evolution mechanical dilator sheath: a single-centre experience. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  B. Wilkoff,et al.  Transvenous Lead Extraction , 2011 .

[13]  L. Epstein,et al.  Lead extraction is preferred for lead revisions and system upgrades: when less is more. , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[14]  David O. Martin,et al.  Initial experience with the Evolution mechanical dilator sheath for lead extraction: safety and efficacy. , 2010, Heart Rhythm.

[15]  C. Ervin,et al.  Lead extraction in the contemporary setting: the LExICon study: an observational retrospective study of consecutive laser lead extractions. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Robert G. Hauser,et al.  Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter–defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  P. Roberts,et al.  Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: a single-centre study of electrosurgical and laser extraction. , 2009, Europace.

[18]  Maria Grazia Bongiorni,et al.  Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA). , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[19]  S. Saba,et al.  Predictors of Complications of Endovascular Chronic Lead Extractions from Pacemakers and Defibrillators: A Single‐Operator Experience , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[20]  Luca Segreti,et al.  Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads , 2008, European heart journal.

[21]  Vince Paul,et al.  Laser-assisted lead extraction: the European experience. , 2007, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[22]  D. Gilligan,et al.  Excimer Laser for Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction: Techniques and Clinical Results , 2001, Lasers in Medical Science.

[23]  D L Hayes,et al.  Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.