Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.

This article outlines the reasons that many radiology practices are converting to digital mammography. In addition, it provides basic information about the issues that must be considered in making the transformation. These issues include technical matters regarding image display, storage, and retrieval as well as clinical and ergonomic considerations.

[1]  Donglin Zeng,et al.  The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[2]  Per Skaane,et al.  Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.

[3]  J M Lewin,et al.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. , 2003, Radiology.

[5]  D S Channin,et al.  Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: a primer. Part 2. Seven brides for seven brothers: the IHE integration profiles. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  J. Keen,et al.  Digital and film mammography. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Constantine A Gatsonis,et al.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Per Skaane,et al.  Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  Eliot L. Siegel,et al.  Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: A Primer , 2001 .

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  B. Hillman,et al.  The American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN): research educational opportunities for academic radiology. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[16]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  F. Shtern.  Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. , 1992, Radiology.

[18]  Ramin Khorasani.  You should eliminate paper from your PACS workflow: why and how? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[19]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Radiologists’ Preferences for Digital Mammographic Display , 2000 .

[20]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. , 2002, Radiology.

[21]  W Qian,et al.  Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[22]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[23]  David Avrin,et al.  Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[24]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  Sameer Singh,et al.  An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[26]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[27]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Digital mammography image quality: image display. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[28]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Jun Wang,et al.  Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary results , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[30]  Hee-Joung Kim,et al.  Clinical evaluation of JPEG2000 compression for digital mammography , 2002 .