Is student-centered pedagogy impossible in Hong Kong? The case of inquiry in classrooms

Hong Kong has been actively promoting a student-centered approach to teaching since the 1980s. Despite this effort, students in Hong Kong still tend to be traditional learners who rarely experience and gain from real student-centered learning. While teachers hold a “quantitative” concept of learning and focus on transmitting declarative knowledge to students (Biggs and Watkins, Classroom learning: Educational psychology for the Asian teacher, 1995), students generally practise “rote learning.” Constructive learning models such as inquiry remain little used by students in most Hong Kong classrooms. This article reports a study that examines the feasibility of implementing inquiry method in Kong Kong’s primary classrooms. It analyses the implementation and some outcomes of an inquiry-based project conducted in two local primary schools—a traditional elite Catholic school and a progressive, less-privileged school. Finally, it discusses the contextual factors as well as cultural issues on teachers’ perception and implementation of inquiry in teaching. These factors include the following: impacts of prevailing ideology in the community of Hong Kong, and the top-down policy-making and management by the government.

[1]  Paul Morris,et al.  The Hong Kong School Curriculum: Development, Issues and Policies, Second Edition , 1996 .

[2]  D. B. Rao,et al.  Quality School Education , 2008 .

[3]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[4]  Michael W. Apple,et al.  Teachers and Texts: A Political Economy of Class and Gender Relations in Education , 1988, History of Education Quarterly.

[5]  M. Fullan Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[6]  Paul D. Eggen,et al.  Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills , 2000 .

[7]  Marcella L. Kysilka,et al.  Instructional Patterns: Strategies for Maximizing Student Learning [with CD-ROM]. , 2005 .

[8]  I. Goodson The Life and Work of Teachers , 1997 .

[9]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[10]  J. Johnston Inquiry and Education: John Dewey and the Quest for Democracy , 2006 .

[11]  E. Eisner,et al.  Conflicting Conceptions Of Curriculum , 1974 .

[12]  C. Fosnot Constructivism : theory, perspectives, and practice , 1996 .

[13]  D. Chan,et al.  Globalization and Education: The Quest for Quality Education in Hong Kong , 2001 .

[14]  S. Sarason The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform , 1990 .

[15]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[16]  Colin Sharp Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[17]  P. Morris School knowledge, the state and the market: An analysis of the Hong Kong secondary school curriculum , 1997 .

[18]  Donald C. Orlich,et al.  Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction , 2003 .

[19]  John Barell PBL : an inquiry approach , 1998 .

[20]  Wayne Seller,et al.  Curriculum: Perspectives and Practice , 1985 .

[21]  L. Chung,et al.  Malfunction in Hong Kong's Curriculum Policymaking System: A Case Study of Curriculum Integration , 2006 .

[22]  M. Mclaughlin Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[23]  David Watkins,et al.  Classroom learning : educational psychology for the Asian teacher , 1995 .