The relevance of the "alphorn of uncertainty" to the financial management of projects under uncertainty

In this paper, both the duration and the cost of an activity are modeled as random variables, and accordingly, the cumulative cost at each time point also becomes a random variable along a project’s progress. We first present the new concept of an “alphorn of uncertainty” (AoU) to describe the domain of cumulative cost variation throughout the life of a project and subsequently apply it to assess the project’s financial status over time. The shape of the alphorn was obtained by mixing Monte Carlo sampling with Gantt chart analysis, which enabled us to determine a project’s financial status related to specific payment modes. To validate the AoU, we designed and conducted an extensive numerical experiment using a randomly generated data set of activity networks. The results indicate that the AoU may be a promising method for the financial management of projects under uncertainty. Furthermore, financial status under uncertain conditions is not sensitive to an activity’s choice of duration distributions or to the form of cost functions. However, payment rules can greatly affect financial status over the duration of a project.

[1]  Roel Leus,et al.  Resource‐Constrained Project Scheduling for Timely Project Completion with Stochastic Activity Durations , 2007 .

[2]  John C. Goodpasture Quantitative Methods in Project Management , 2003 .

[3]  Eleni Hadjiconstantinou,et al.  A decomposition-based stochastic programming approach for the project scheduling problem under time/cost trade-off settings and uncertain durations , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Salah E. Elmaghraby,et al.  On the fallacy of averages in project risk management , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joseph G. Szmerekovsky,et al.  Scheduling projects with stochastic activity duration to maximize expected net present value , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  W. Edward Back,et al.  PROBABILISTIC FORECASTING OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE USING STOCHASTIC S CURVES , 2004 .

[8]  S. S. Erenguc,et al.  Solving time/cost trade‐off problems with discounted cash flows using generalized benders decomposition , 1993 .

[9]  Walter O. Rom,et al.  An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Modeling uncertain activity duration by fuzzy number and discrete-event simulation , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Rainer Kolisch,et al.  PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library , 1996 .

[12]  Yu Xu,et al.  Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Grzegorz Waligóra,et al.  Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Funda Sivrikaya Şerifoğlu,et al.  Client‐contractor bargaining on net present value in project scheduling with limited resources , 2009 .

[15]  Rema Padman,et al.  Knowledge integration using problem spaces: A study in resource-constrained project scheduling , 2006, J. Sched..

[16]  L. M. Naeni,et al.  A fuzzy approach for the earned value management , 2011 .

[17]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Performance-Based Earned Value , 2006 .

[18]  Sönke Hartmann,et al.  A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Laure‐Emmanuelle Drezet,et al.  RCPSP with financial costs , 2010 .

[20]  Rema Padman,et al.  Project Contracts and Payment Schedules: The Client's Problem , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Reha Uzsoy,et al.  Lagrangian heuristics for scheduling new product development projects in the pharmaceutical industry , 2007, J. Heuristics.

[22]  Prabuddha De,et al.  The discrete time-cost tradeoff problem revisited , 1995 .

[23]  Kenneth F. Reinschmidt,et al.  Probabilistic Forecasting of Project Duration Using Bayesian Inference and the Beta Distribution , 2009 .

[24]  Tao Jia,et al.  Metaheuristics for multi-mode capital-constrained project payment scheduling , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Optimizing Discounted Cash Flows in Project Scheduling—An Ant Colony Optimization Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[26]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Progress payments in project scheduling problems , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Rainer Kolisch,et al.  PSPLIB - A project scheduling problem library: OR Software - ORSEP Operations Research Software Exchange Program , 1997 .

[28]  Prabuddha De,et al.  Complexity of the Discrete Time-Cost Tradeoff Problem for Project Networks , 1997, Oper. Res..

[29]  Gündüz Ulusoy,et al.  Four Payment Models for the Multi-Mode Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discounted Cash Flows , 2001, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  R Tavakoli Moghadam,et al.  A New Bi-Objective Model for a Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discounted Cash Flows and four Payment Models , 2008 .

[31]  Gang Yu,et al.  A two-stage stochastic programming approach for project planning with uncertain activity durations , 2007, J. Sched..

[32]  Joseph G. Szmerekovsky The Impact of Contractor Behavior on the Client's Payment-Scheduling Problem , 2005, Manag. Sci..