The Issue of Scope in Contingent Valuation Studies

[1]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Embedding effects: Stimulus representation and response mode , 1993 .

[2]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[3]  V. Smith,et al.  Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts , 1992 .

[4]  W. Pommerehne,et al.  Valuing Reductions of Public Risks: The Case of Hazardous Waste , 1994 .

[5]  Gregory K. Leonard,et al.  Chapter II – Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence , 1993 .

[6]  R. Carson,et al.  Valuing the Preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone , 1994 .

[7]  John W. Payne,et al.  Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions , 1993 .

[8]  M S Thompson,et al.  Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[9]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988 , 1992 .

[10]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[11]  R. Carson,et al.  Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1995 .

[12]  R. Carson,et al.  The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water , 1993 .

[13]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[14]  Wesley D. Seitz,et al.  Measuring Water Quality Benefits , 1986 .

[15]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection , 1993 .