Students' working strategies and outcomes in a creativity-supporting learning environment

This paper describes results from a teaching experiment at the Department of Computer Science at the University of Helsinki, in which we studied students' different working strategies and tried to find patterns between these strategies and the creativity of the students' work. In a typical computer science course in Finland, the teaching is quite strictly structured and the support structures (e.g. lectures, lab sessions) are highly teacher-driven. In contrast, our intention was to create a learning environment where the support structures would focus on supporting creativity to bring forth new ideas and innovation. We were especially interested in the working strategies that students would use outside our learning sessions, the students´ outcomes with regards to creativity, and the interplay between working strategies and the creativity of the outcomes. To put our ideas into practice, we designed a pilot course utilizing practices from research into creativity and intrinsic motivation. To answer our research questions we interviewed all course attendees (n=33) twice, at the beginning and at the end of the course. We chose LEGO® Mindstorms robots as the platform for the project. While further studies are needed, our preliminary results suggest that there is a pattern between working strategy and creativity.

[1]  Matti Lattu.  The school from the teacher´s perspective : The teaching space of eleven change-oriented teachers , 2003 .

[2]  Frank Klassner,et al.  LEGO MindStorms: not just for K-12 anymore , 2003, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[3]  Susan P. Imberman.  Three fun assignments for an Artificial Intelligence class , 2005 .

[4]  Jaakko Kurhila,et al.  Why using robots to teach computer science can be successful theoretical reflection to andragogy and minimalism , 2008, Koli Calling.

[5]  James M. Higgins.  101 Creative Problem Solving Techniques: The Handbook of New Ideas for Business , 1994 .

[6]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[7]  Amruth N. Kumar,et al.  Using robots in an undergraduate artificial intelligence course: an experience report , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[8]  Harrison H. Owen,et al.  Open Space Technology: A User's Guide , 1993 .

[9]  Frank Klassner,et al.  A case study of LEGO Mindstorms'#8482; suitability for artificial intelligence and robotics courses at the college level , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[10]  Ned Herrmann.  The Whole Brain Business Book , 1996 .

[11]  Frank Klassner,et al.  Mindstorms without robotics: an alternative to simulations in systems courses , 2007, SIGCSE '07.

[12]  T. Buzan.  Use both sides of your brain , 1976 .

[13]  Bob Eberle.  Scamper: Games for Imagination Development , 1984 .

[14]  Bob Jeffrey,et al.  Creativity and performativity in teaching and learning: tensions, dilemmas, constraints, accommodations and synthesis , 2008 .

[15]  E. Deci,et al.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Jari Lavonen,et al.  Bits and processes on markets and webs: an analysis of virtuality, reality and metaphors in a modern learning environment , 2000 .

[17]  Garnet W. Millar.  E. Paul Torrance: The Creativity Man An Authorized Biography , 1995 .

[18]  Roberta Klibaner,et al.  A robotics lab for CS1 , 2005 .

[19]  T.C. Lethbridge,et al.  Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) and the Software Engineering Education Knowledge (SEEK) - a preliminary mapping , 2001, 10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice.

[20]  R. Spencer.  Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[21]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[22]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[23]  A. Osborn.  Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[24]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[25]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored , 1995 .